AI Rate Professor

English

Christina Axtell

ENG1A · ENGL301CSUF · ENG1B · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage deadlines and write exactly to her standards without timely help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedSlow feedbackTough unfair graderUnclear promptsPoor email response
  • late posts, wrong due dates, and delayed grades.
  • essays.
  • , but most warn strongly against her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and little feedback mean even full effort often fails to yield an easy A.

Online has one positive pass story; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students report , and unclear expectations that raise real difficulty.

One older review called an online section simple; most online and in-person comments call it hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

provided; organization issues matter more than seat time.

Online and ; core pain is deadlines and feedback.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Majority warn not to take her due to disorganization, slow responses, and .

One online reviewer recommends her; most online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and grades with little discussion.

Format shift

; one online student still passed with B after hard work.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Essays, discussions, readings, timed writings, and .

Format shift

Online mentions discussion/reading load; and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and weak communication dominate the experience.

Format shift

Online and in-person align on disorganization; rare praise for .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays, discussion boards, timed writings, and sit-down final.

Format shift

Both formats center essays and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly negative in-person/flagged reviews about unfair , and .

Main concern

Inconsistent deadlines, little guidance, and .

What students said

“Inconsistent deadlines are common, as she is usually using last semester's syllabus without updating it.”
ENG1B
“she is a and ”
ENG1B
“This teacher is a !”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online Eng sections range from one strong recommend with hard work to two scathing disorganization complaints.

Main concern

, and extreme difficulty for some online students.

What students said

“Professor .”
ENG1B
“ .”
ENG1B
“Don't bother emailing her questions about assignments b/c she won't get back to you until the day after the .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Hard timed quizzes and ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Hard quizzesTimed writingStrict time limitEssay heavyTurnItIn

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Essay-focused assessment with unclear directions and tests that feel random; .

EssaysUnclear promptsTests from nowhereLate feedback
“ ”
ENG1B
“ if they're even graded in time”
ENG1B

Online

Online work includes essays, discussions, hard quizzes with strict time limits, and TurnItIn date confusion; webcam proctoring not clearly proven.

EssaysDiscussion boardsHard timed quizzesTurnItIn
“Quizes are very hard with a strict time limit.”
ENG1A
“the syllabus said one date, and TurnItIn had a different date”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! You've been warned!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (3 online, 8 in person), emphasizing disorganization and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Disaster

28/100

“I've been in college for a long time, but this is one of the .”

🗂️ Chronic Disorganization

25/100

“Inconsistent deadlines are common, as she is usually using last semester's syllabus without updating it.”

⚖️

22/100

“This teacher is a !”

💬 Rare Positive

70/100

“Professor .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Organization

  • using last semester's syllabus without updating it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will fail if you don't write EXACTLY what she wants
  • Quizes are very hard with a strict time limit

Theme 3

✉️ About Communication

  • won't get back to you until the day after the
  • more
  • I received absolutely no response

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning 2010-2017 across online and in-person formats , and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1B7 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENGL301CSUF1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values