AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Tamar Andrews

CD128 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a knowledgeable instructor and can handle real effort and possible course-management glitches.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnows her stuffCell phone accessibleEarn your ADate confusion onlinePolarized sections
  • One online review loves her expertise and 24/7 accessibility but says you must earn the A.
  • The other review, tagged in person yet describing site issues, calls dates wrong and .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Positive reviewer with an A still says she is not easy and you must earn that A.

Online review stresses earn-your-A; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

one student finds it challenging, another rates difficulty only 2.

Online difficulty feels higher; in-person-coded review reports lower difficulty but worse course management.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while the other does not clearly require it.

; the other review does not clearly define attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and opposite tones on organization versus expertise.

Online review is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

A and B- both appear; comments say the A must be earned rather than given away.

Format shift

Online path to A is effort-based; other .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews , but earning an A implies real ongoing work.

Format shift

Neither format provides a .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong content expertise and access clash with complaints about wrong dates and .

Format shift

Online praise for expertise; in-person-coded review criticizes site accuracy and feedback.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention work postings and feedback but .

Format shift

Limited assessment-detail in both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person-coded review complains about incorrect dates, late work posts, and , and advises taking another section.

Main concern

Course site dates and .

What students said

“Many of the dates were incorrect on the site and differed from the course outline.”
CD128
“ . There are other sections of .”
CD128

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online CD128 student , and expert, while stressing the A must be earned.

Main concern

Course is not easy; you must work hard for the A.

What students said

“Cool instructor that gives us her cell phone number and . Really knows her stuff!!! But she is not easy. You are going to have to earn that A.”
CD128

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-coded review discusses course site dates and .

“ . There are other sections of .”
CD128

Online

Online review focuses on earning an A and instructor access; proven.

“But she is not easy. You are going to have to earn that A.”
CD128

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really knows her stuff!!! But she is not easy. You are going to have to earn that A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 mixed-format reviews, highlighting expertise versus organization conflict. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Content Expertise

85/100

“Really knows her stuff!!!”

📅 Organization Risk

30/100

“Many of the dates were incorrect on the site and differed from the course outline.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

50/100

“There are other sections of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cool instructor that gives us her cell phone number
  • Really knows her stuff!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she is not easy
  • You are going to have to earn that A
  • B-

Theme 3

🛠️ About Course Management

  • dates were incorrect on the site
  • gave work 2 days late one week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting 2016 reviews (one online, one in-person .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1282 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values