AI Rate Professor

Speech

Courtney Neujahr

COMM1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her for COMM1 if you want a and reachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive and sweetClear grading criteriaGood feedbackAccessible outside classManageable assignments
  • Both reviews rate her a 5 and .
  • She can feel a bit tough at first but .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is reported with solid work; she is a bit tough early but .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content feels approachable, though a .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Both reviews are strongly positive and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Clear criteria and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

65/100

Some assignments are easy while while, keeping overall load manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person COMM1 students describe her as great, sweet, and through feedback.

Main concern

and a .

What students said

“ ”
COMM1
“ and sweet. Some of the , but while to complete.”
COMM1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe proctored exams and .

Clear grading criteriaAssignment-based work

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews and assignment work.

Clear grading criteriaAssignments
“Some of the , but while to complete.”
COMM1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews emphasizing supportiveness and manageable work. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and sweet.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ ”

📝 Workload Balance

65/100

“Some of the , but while to complete.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • and sweet.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Some of the , but while to complete.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short positive reviews support a strong pattern but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values