AI Rate Professor

English

Emily Liu

ENG1A · ENG1B · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want to become a stronger writer and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough but fair graderBuilds better writersVery helpful one-on-oneOnline workload heavy for someInspirational English professor
  • Most students praise her as an excellent writing teacher who helps you improve.
  • She is repeatedly called a , so an A takes real revision and effort.
  • In-person reviews are glowing while some online students found the work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

46/100

She is a and not an easy A, though serious revision and help sessions can still earn strong grades.

; in-person reviews still call her tough but fair.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Writing craft itself is not impossible, but essay standards and .

Online students mention heavier workload; in-person students focus more on growth than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, and participation or EC can make showing up matter.

; online attendance is not clearly defined.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students strongly recommend her for growth as a writer .

In-person reviews are almost uniformly glowing; and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

among students who love her teaching.

Format shift

and inconsistent; in-person students still say she grades tough but rewards effort.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect , and revision; online sections especially feel work-heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews complain about .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

She is widely praised as inspiring, helpful, and excellent at building writing confidence and skill.

Format shift

In-person praise is stronger; online teaching is still often praised but has a few severe detractors.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and participation more than big proctored exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and writing tasks; online adds frequent discussion posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students call her one of the but and confidence-building.

Main concern

Early essay grades can be low until you show improvement and .

What students said

“ you so much space in writing so you can innovate and write about what you actually love.”
ENG1B
“She's an , but if u show her that u r trying, she will give u a good grade.”
ENG1A
“Emily is the .”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ENG1B is mixed: many praise her help and growth, but a loud minority report , and .

Main concern

Heavy essay and seeking an easy online A.

What students said

“So much work, it was absolutely ridiculous.”
ENG1B
“Although she is a get an A in the class.”
ENG1B
“ and was inconsistent in grading, and .”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and .

Essay-heavyDiscussion postsShort quizzesNo clear proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, EC, and participation rather than proctored exam software.

Essay draftsParticipation pointsExtra credit
“She's an , but if u show her that u r trying, she will give u a good grade.”
ENG1A
“She gives EC and so .”
ENG1A

Online

, and hard-graded essays without clear webcam or Lockdown Browser rules.

Discussion board postsShort quizzesEssaysHard essay grading
“ , and essays;we had nothing more after that.”
ENG1B
“ and asks for minimum of 350 words per discussion post plus at least 2 (100 words)response.”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ you so much space in writing so you can innovate and write about what you actually love.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (5 online, 4 in-person), highlighting tough grading and strong writing mentorship. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Emily is the .”

⚖️ Hard but

34/100

“She's an , but if u show her that u r trying, she will give u a good grade.”

🌐 Online Experience Split

55/100

“So much work, it was absolutely ridiculous. I took an .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Liu is the best!
  • She is willing to give a lot of guidance and help with papers.
  • Not an easy A but she makes you a better writer!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades harsh, too.
  • She grades the , but she is very fair.
  • I ended up passing w/ a B cuz I showed improvements!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Workload

  • and asks for minimum of 350 words per discussion post plus at least 2 (100 words)response.
  • and was inconsistent in grading.
  • Do yourself a favor and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across online and in-person formats show a consistent tough-but-excellent pattern, with older dates and a few sharp online outliers.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1B7 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values