AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Paul Boyer

ACCT1B · ACCT210 · ACCT1A · ACCOUNTING1A · ACCT215 · AUDITING275 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can teach yourself from the book and tolerate unprofessional pacing.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLaid-back easy graderRambles off-topicSelf-teach requiredOften lateSlow grading
  • Lenient grading and help many students pass with an A if .
  • Lectures often ramble into unrelated stories and can feel unprepared or late.
  • Attendance is often optional, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report easy grading, , and that even when lectures are weak.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is passable with self-study, but pacing can be fast and lectures often fail to teach the material clearly.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

, though exam reviews still help.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendations split hard between kind helpful supporters and unless .

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students repeatedly call him an easy or very lenient grader with and flexibility on makeups.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and , but comments do not describe an .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many students , and leaves them teaching themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Success depends on homework plus exam reviews, with grades reflecting both preparation and tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report a laid-back but uneven experience: , and delayed feedback.

Main concern

while dealing with , and off-topic lectures.

What students said

“If and teaching yourself then take the class.”
ACCT1A
“the entire semester he was a week late in ”
ACCT210
“If you do all the homework and show up to class for .”
AUDITING275

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

helping if you self-study the expected material.

Exam reviewsIn-person examsHomework-aligned prep

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but some students say tested material differed from what was promised.

Exam reviewsIn-person exams
“If you do all the homework and show up to class for .”
AUDITING275
“He would tell us what to study but .”
AUDITING275

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Its hard to rate this guy as a teacher because he doesnt teach at all. He tells stories that barely relate to the subject matter.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, , and reliability issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

34/100

“I would , unless you can teach accounting to yourself.”

⚖️

76/100

“He's really laid-back and is a real easy gradervery lenient.”

🕒 Professionalism Issues

30/100

“Always arrived between 15 & 20 minutes late.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rambles a lot and goes off on many tangents
  • He is a ; therefore he does not teach
  • lectures are not always relevant to the topics

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up to class and the and you will fly by with an A
  • gives a lot of and always prepares you for his exams
  • His class is passable but you wont learn anything

Theme 3

⏱️ About Reliability

  • Late to class at least half the time (even the final!)
  • a week late in
  • takes a very

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed in-person reviews span 2014-2016 with mixed but consistent themes; older sample limits current confidence.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT1B3 reviews
AUDITING2752 reviews
ACCOUNTING1A1 review
ACCT1A1 review
ACCT2101 review
Show 1 more courses
ACCT2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values