AI Rate Professor

Economics

A Rosenberg

HIST22 · ECON4H · MICROECON · ECON2 · HST22 · ECONECON · HIST8 · ECONMICRO · BASICUSHISTORY · ECON4 · HUM10B · HUM10A · HISTORY8 · ECON · HIST7 · MIROECON · MICROECONOMICS · HISTORY22 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a challenging, idea-driven professor and will read and use office hours; avoid if and light work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBrilliant but ConfusingPolarizingEssay & Reading HeavyHelpful Office HoursBlackboard Heavy
  • , and life-changing; and disorganized.
  • Humanities and ; econ often depends on Blackboard, practice quizzes, and online work.
  • Effort is rewarded if you read, attend, and seek help, but passive students struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some find grading fair or easy with effort and practice materials, but many describe hard tests, daily quizzes, and .

All counted reviews are in person; some comments describe online-style econ homework but are flagged in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and demanding expectations make the content intellectually heavy for many.

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and understanding, even when not always labeled mandatory.

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

ambitious readers recommend her highly, others urge total avoidance.

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

; others say exams are ridiculous and outcomes feel random.

Format shift

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and essay-style assessments are common.

Format shift

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Many praise brilliance, passion, and help; nearly as , and disorganization.

Format shift

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and homework depending on course.

Format shift

All evidence is from the in-person review set.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized across humanities, history, and econ: passionate and and , and essay or online work driving grades.

Main concern

, and mismatch between class talk and tests for many students.

What students said

“Probably one of the her students.”
HUM10A
“I'm sorry, but this lady has no business teaching... .”
HIST7
“ and I learned very little. I pulled an A out of my ass.”
HUM10A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam formats vary by course from essay prompts to MC plus written parts; reviews .

Essay testsReading quizzesBlackboard practice quizzesMultiple choice hard partsPractice tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and Blackboard practice materials; difficulty and clarity vary widely by student.

Essay examsDaily or frequent quizzesBlackboard practiceWritten and MC exam parts
“ . gives prompts beforehand and .”
HIST8
“The only thing mildly difficult about this professor is the multiple chioce part of her exams, but the written part is an easy 100%.”
ECON4
“She gave a quiz everyday of class!!! (No Joke) so you had to be there every class and on time.”
HISTORY22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a and your ability to think.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Polarization

55/100

“I'm sorry, but this lady has no business teaching... .”

🧠 Intellectual Challenge

35/100

“Expect to be challenged. She's very intelligent herself, and expects you to know more than the average student does.”

❤️ Cares & Helps

70/100

“If you talk to her and just ask questions she will bend over backwards to help you.”

👍

55/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very passionate when teaching
  • she ramble on about things that don't pertain to her lecture
  • Teaches you so well (if you do online material) that the class is easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but reading and studying is still a must
  • I pulled an A out of my ass
  • Worked extremely hard to get a good grade and learned nothing
  • copy all the quizes and use them on the Exams

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • legitimately cares about her students
  • always willing to help you, wants you to do well
  • She's really mean, even online
  • one of the better teachers of economics

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with rich conflicting detail across multiple departments give strong but polarized signal.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 515
3 out of 57
2 out of 55
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ECON414 reviews
HUM10A13 reviews
HUM10B3 reviews
MICROECON3 reviews
ECON2 reviews
Show 13 more courses
ECON22 reviews
HIST82 reviews
BASICUSHISTORY1 review
ECON4H1 review
ECONECON1 review
ECONMICRO1 review
HIST221 review
HIST71 review
HISTORY221 review
HISTORY81 review
HST221 review
MICROECONOMICS1 review
MIROECON1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2