AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Kathleen Johnson

PSYCH30 · PSYPSY3 · SOCSOC1 · SOC1458 · SOC30 · PSY30 · INTROSOCIOLOGY · SOSC1 · SOC1 · INTROSOC · SOCSOC · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will attend every class, read heavily, and tolerate a rigid, sometimes rude style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMandatory attendanceStingy participation pointsPolarizing personalityStudy guides and BlackboardExtra credit available
  • Reviews and rude, condescending ones.
  • Attendance and participation heavily affect the grade; miss more than two classes and .
  • Exams, chapter work, and papers reward reading and showing up more than inspiring lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some report As with minimal studying or , but , and full participation points that are hard to earn.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Intro sociology and psych content is standard, with hard multi-chapter exams and weekly chapter work for many sections.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Consistently, missing more and participation is required to pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Roughly half praise organization and fairness while half urge avoidance over rudeness and weak teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tests can be picky, study guides incomplete, and as stingy.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and heavy attendance expectations.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and funny stories for some; boring lectures, self-teaching, and rudeness for many others.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and participation points.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some love organization, study guides, and discussion; many report rudeness, boring lectures, and .

Main concern

and a cold interpersonal style.

What students said

“She was literally the .”
SOC1
“I loved her! She is so funny, and .”
PSYPSY3
“If you miss more than 2 classes, she takes points off ( 100 for four).”
SOC1
“she is stingy with them, not to mention that she doesn't know anyone's name.”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often use study guides and mixed MC/essay formats, but can include unexpected detail and multi-chapter coverage.

Multiple choice examsStudy guidesEssay questionsSurprise detailed items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

vague guides with surprise questions and large chapter spans.

Multiple choice examsStudy guidesEssay questionsSurprise detailed items
“I got an A .”
SOC1
“study guides are vague and not all inclusive. .”
INTROSOC
“Had multiple choice tests, one 9 page essay, and and MC.”
SOC1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes, at times, Johnson comes across as rude; however, once you get to know her (as class goes on) you will see that she isn't bad.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She is so funny, and .”

👎 Personality Concerns

30/100

“She is beyond rude.”

📅

18/100

“If you miss more than 2 classes, she takes points off ( 100 for four).”

👍 Recommendation Split

44/100

“ .”

⚖️

38/100

“she is stingy with them, not to mention that she doesn't know anyone's name.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are boring
  • pretty much just taught from the book

Theme 2

😠 About Personality

  • literally the
  • beyond rude
  • Very Rude and Condescending
  • once you get to know her you will see that she isn't bad

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Got an A but I went to every class, studied
  • Gives 60 pts x-credit
  • study guides are vague and not all inclusive

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty in-person reviews spanning 2007-2015 with rich detail and consistent polarizing themes support a high credibility score.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 53

Course coverage

SOC113 reviews
SOCSOC4 reviews
SOC303 reviews
INTROSOC2 reviews
PSY302 reviews
Show 6 more courses
INTROSOCIOLOGY1 review
PSYCH301 review
PSYPSY31 review
SOC14581 review
SOCSOC11 review
SOSC11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1