AI Rate Professor

History

Charissa Keup

HISTORY16 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

; if you already love history and can keep up with dense, fast lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture MarathonInformation OverloadHard EssaysGE UnfriendlyHistory Heavy
  • Students describe nonstop note-heavy lectures with little digestion time.
  • Essays and volume of material are seen as hard for a GE-level history course.
  • She prioritizes deep learning over clear test-focused highlights, which frustrates grade-focused students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

, and high difficulty make an A require heavy sustained effort.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students call the pace impossible without a strong history base and .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

small sample.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

All three reviews steer general-education students toward a less intense instructor.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Hard essays and a learning-over-scores focus make high marks feel difficult to secure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Constant lectures plus hard essays and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

She is seen as content-rich but rushes notes and fails to filter what students must master for tests.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Essays and up beyond lecture notes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and poorly matched to students who only want to pass GE requirements.

Main concern

Too much material too fast with hard essays and little prioritization of tested facts.

What students said

“Lectures from the start of class to the end of class, everyday.”
HISTORY16
“She gives a lot of information to digest all at once.”
16175
“ .”
HISTORY16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment feels strict due to hard essays and massive content with little test-focused filtering.

Hard EssaysHeavy ContentBook Dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and dense lecture content without clear open-book or soft proctoring signals.

Hard EssaysDense Lectures
“ . Only way to learn is to read the books she gives you.”
HISTORY16
“I prefer teachers who clearly explain the MOST important facts (the ones that are on the test) and chuck the rest.”
16175

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lectures from the start of class to the end of class, everyday. No videos, just rushing thru notes thinking we can learn the material within seconds.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 , and GE mismatch. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Content Overload

22/100

“She gives a lot of information to digest all at once.”

🚫 GE Fit

28/100

“if you just want to pass the class to finish your .”

✍️ Hard Essays

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • No videos, just rushing thru notes
  • She cares more about her students learning history as opposed .
  • It's Impossible to digest all of the information

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three short in-person reviews from 2015 agree on difficulty, but the sample is too small and old for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

161752 reviews
HISTORY161 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1