AI Rate Professor

Literature

Michael Runyan

ENG15AB · ENG1A · ENG15A · LIT1 · ENGLISH · ENG65 · EN200 · LATIN · ENGLISH15B · 15A · LIT15A · ENG15B · CLSS5 · ENGLISH200 · ENG200 · ENG101 · LIT25 · LITERATURE · ENG1B · LIT15 · ENG25LIT · ENGLI200 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

unless you only need an easy grade and can .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A but boringRude and grumpyMonotone lecturesLow engagementSelf-taught needed
  • Many call him an easy A with light work and short classes
  • Teaching quality is widely criticized as boring, rude, or checked-out
  • if you want the grade and can learn alone

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students say do minimal work or group paragraphs and still walk out with an A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Content load is light—group work, short writes, and limited reading—though .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and let you leave early; others still expect presence for .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Even easy-A fans because he is boring, rude, or teaches little.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Many report easy As and curves, but a minority say he grades harshly or loves Cs and Ds.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Short classes, group worksheets, few quizzes or paragraphs, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Frequent complaints of monotone boredom, no help, and disrespect overshadow occasional praise.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of short quizzes, paragraphs, group work, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person lit and English sections range from easy group work to harsh demeanor; learning value is often low.

Main concern

Rudeness, boredom, poor help, and .

What students said

“the easiest A ever!”
ENG200
“This is a really easy A, but if you fall behind or need help with anything, DEAR GOD don't ask him.”
ENG15A
“I've never seen such disrespect toward students. He actually SCREAMS at people!”
ENG15AB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

to quote-ID tests that feel random if .

Short quizzesStudy guidesQuote identificationOptional review sessionsSome no final

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and short writes to hard random-quote lit tests.

Easy quizzesNo final in some sectionsQuote-based testsStudy guides
“4 quizzes, 150 !”
ENG200
“Test is a bunch of TOTALLY RANDOM 1 sentence quotes from reading”
ENG15AB

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easiest class of my life but did not learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 in-person reviews, capturing the easy-grade versus poor-teaching split. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“I learned nothing. .”

🅰️ Easy A Pattern

82/100

“All in all- the easiest A ever!”

👎 Low Recommendation

32/100

“ IF !”

😤 Classroom Climate

25/100

“He yelled at a girl on the first day of class for yawning.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Painfully boring
  • monatone voice that would put you to sleep
  • He drones on

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easiest A ever
  • you'd have to try to get less than an A
  • Just group work, paragraph and then you are off to go

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character

  • rude, grumpy
  • He actually SCREAMS at people
  • Not willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six in-person reviews over many years consistently describe easy grades paired with poor teaching and demeanor.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 57
3 out of 513
2 out of 57
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG20013 reviews
ENG15A6 reviews
ENG15B4 reviews
ENG15AB2 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
Show 17 more courses
ENG1B2 reviews
ENG652 reviews
15A1 review
CLSS51 review
EN2001 review
ENG1011 review
ENG25LIT1 review
ENGLI2001 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH15B1 review
ENGLISH2001 review
LATIN1 review
LIT11 review
LIT151 review
LIT15A1 review
LIT251 review
LITERATURE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values