AI Rate Professor

English

Daniel Gardner

ENG1A · ENG1B · ENGLISH1B · ENGLISH200 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you must; expect uneven teaching, delayed grades, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsLate GradingTough Essay GraderParticipation HelpsUnclear Lectures
  • Student opinions and unhelpful experiences.
  • Late or .
  • Participation can buy some lenience, but several students strongly warn against him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some report fair or , but many call him a .

Online review is negative on fairness; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but lectures and materials confuse others and difficulty ratings sit mid-high.

Online and in-person both report moderate to high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Showing up and participating is repeatedly linked to better treatment and lenience.

Participation .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Positive outliers exist, but .

Online review is strongly negative; in-person opinions are split but lean negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Several students call him a tough or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Typical load is several essays plus participation .

Format shift

Workload details are clearer in in-person summer and term comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Helpful and funny for some, but many describe boring lectures, confusion, and low care for teaching.

Format shift

; in-person quality is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and occasional tests rather than pure exams.

Format shift

; online mentions tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews range from friendly and , and uncaring teaching.

Main concern

, and weak lecture value.

What students said

“ and willing to answer any questions. and in class participation is a big thing for him.”
ENG1A
“ ! It was a gamble because he was not on ratemyprofessor when I signed up for his class.”
ENG1B
“He is not very helpful and .”
ENGLISH1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review strongly warns against him for and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ ! He did not keep up with so you never knew what you had.”
ENGLISH200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; proctoring details are not clearly described.

Essay heavyOccasional testsDelayed feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation with .

Multiple essaysParticipation write-ups
“Had him for summer, and we had 5 essays, daily in-class participation write ups, and that's it.”
ENG1B

Online

Online student reports tests on material never covered and poor grade visibility.

Tests on uncovered materialLate grading
“He would give you test on materials that he did not go over or say anything about.”
ENGLISH200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! It was a gamble because he was not on ratemyprofessor when I signed up for his class and boy will I never do that again!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in person), , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️

32/100

“ ! It was a gamble because he was not on ratemyprofessor when I signed up for his class and boy will I never do that again!”

⏳

28/100

“He is not very helpful and .”

🙋

70/100

“ and willing to answer any questions. and in class participation is a big thing for him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His class is painfully boring. The books and .
  • Great teacher! Super nice and funny.
  • He is very young and his lectures are common sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it a .
  • Grades pretty easily as well.
  • By doing so, I was able to earn a B by not doing too much work.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • ! He did not keep up with so you never knew what you had.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2013-2014 with mixed but detailed comments and both formats represented; opinions are polarized so confidence is only medium.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1B3 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENGLISH1B1 review
ENGLISH2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1