AI Rate Professor

English

Dean Ramser

ENG200 · ENG1A · ENG300 · ENGLISH1A · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you like creative, personality-driven classes and can tolerate uneven structure; skip if you need tight organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherBusywork heavyCreative styleUnclear assignmentsSense of humor
  • Reviews and worst-teacher warnings.
  • Many say content is easy or manageable, but organization and clarity of .
  • Helpful and funny for engaged students; others report busywork, changing plans, and little learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many call the class easy, but others say not an easy A because of and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Several students say he simplifies material and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Missing class can cost random in-class points, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Strong fans recommend him highly; .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; others feel docked for ridiculous things or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Busywork and essays appear often, but many still call the work easy or short.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality swings from creative and and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and some essay exams all appear.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English students either love his humor and support or and unprofessional vibes.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“This is one of the ! !”
ENG1A
“Doesn't stick to the syllabus, and adds random grades and assignments as he goes.”
ENG200
“Yes the class was easy but .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and some essay exams rather than soft open-book tests.

Essay examsPeer reviewParticipation pointsIn-class random assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and unpredictable in-class points.

Essay examsPeer reviewRandom in-class assignments
“peer review, class participation, and essay exams.”
ENG1A
“if you miss class one day you will be absent from multiple random in class assignments”
ENG300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is one of the ! !”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization, ease, and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎭 Polarizing Experience

50/100

“I don't think a single person in my class liked this guy...”

😊 Humor & Energy

70/100

“He has a GREAT sense of humor, and makes you WANT to come to class.”

📋 Organization Issues

35/100

“Constantly changing things up. I never knew when things were due or what was going on.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Such an awesome guy with a creative way of teaching!
  • Doesn't really "teach" anything just assigned busy work from the textbook.
  • He talked himself in circles and made no sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His class is easy, and the .
  • Definitely not an easy A. Most of the class is failing.
  • He will grade you down for the most ridiculous things.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and cares about students.
  • Nice guy though!
  • He takes things extremely personally and is unprofessional.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen in-person reviews with rich detail and a .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG2006 reviews
ENG3002 reviews
3001 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1