AI Rate Professor

History

Wendy Gonaver

HIST22 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Solid history pick if you will do the reading and engage; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturerHeavy reading loadNo textbook requiredForgiving graderAttendance optional
  • Most students find her knowledgeable, passionate, and engaging in HIST22.
  • and substantial; papers and tests matter, but no textbook is required.
  • ; take the class seriously or you may not pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are possible if and work seriously, but effort is required and she will not pass those who coast.

All evidence is from in-person HIST22 reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is approachable history material but and .

All evidence is from in-person HIST22 reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

A student explicitly .

All evidence is from in-person HIST22 reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Four of five reviews praise her as engaging and .

All evidence is from in-person HIST22 reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Students call her forgiving and success-oriented, with reported A and B grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of required reading plus papers, discussions, and tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most describe her as knowledgeable, passionate, and engaging; one called class useless.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person HIST22 is lecture, video, reading, and and no required textbook for some sections.

Main concern

and uneven lecture variety; one student found discussions useless.

What students said

“Great teacher. She does not require a textbook. Llts of reading. She's very engaging.”
HIST22
“ !”
HIST22
“ . .”
HIST22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on reading-backed tests and papers rather than clearly student-friendly open formats.

In-person testsPapersDiscussion-based work

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention tests, papers, and discussions but .

TestsPapersDiscussions
“Class consists of .”
HIST22
“Just had us . .”
HIST22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! PASS”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Great teacher. She does not require a textbook. Llts of reading. She's very engaging. I learned a lot.”

📚 Reading Load

42/100

“ !”

🗓️

85/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“Overall a good teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very engaging. I learned a lot.
  • She is VERY knowledgable and passionate on the subject.
  • SHE DOES NO MAKE YOU MEMORIZE DATES SHE ENGAGES YOU IN CONVERSATION.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • PASS
  • She is forgiving and wants you to succeed.
  • Useless. Just had us .

Theme 3

📖 About Workload

  • Llts of reading.
  • !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews from 2013-2014 show mostly consistent praise with one strong outlier, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST225 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values