AI Rate Professor

English

David Kammerzelt

ENG1A14615 · ENG1A · ENGLISH1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

A solid English 1A pick if and a manageable workload.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear expectationsRhetoric-focused essaysSlightly monotonedHelpful when confusedManageable English 1A
  • Most students call him a strong English 1A instructor with .
  • Course focuses on rhetorical analysis more than creative writing.
  • A few note monotone delivery and repetitive structure, but still rate him well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple As and comments that the class is not too hard if .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable for English 1A when students follow structure, though rhetoric focus can feel narrow.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him as , and among their better English teachers.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and multiple reported As suggest fair-to-lenient grading for students who follow directions.

Format shift

and clarity comments.

Workload

Light

72/100

Students describe a manageable class with .

Format shift

Workload reads as light-to-moderate from in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Praised as , and even the only mild monotone critiques.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment centers on multiple essays with a rhetoric focus rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

and prompts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and generally easy if you follow his guidelines, with a rhetoric-heavy focus.

Main concern

Delivery can feel monotoned and .

What students said

“He is the . .”
ENGLISH1A
“ , and his class isn't too hard as long as you follow the general guidelines that he provides.”
ENG1A
“Every single class meeting had the same structure for the entire semester. Very monotoned.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-driven with .

Essay-basedClear guidelinesRhetoric analysis

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and rhetorical analysis with clear requirements.

Multiple essaysRhetoric focusClear instructions
“Used the same exact essay prompt for all 5 essays.”
ENG1A
“Gives you very clear instructions on what is required and will help you out a lot if .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and manageability. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He is the . .”

📋

85/100

“ , and his class isn't too hard as long as you follow the general guidelines that he provides.”

😐 Delivery Style

55/100

“A tad bit mono-toned at times but not dreadfully so.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A tad bit mono-toned at times

Theme 2

📝 About Essays and Focus

  • focused more on rhetorical analysis
  • same exact essay prompt for all 5 essays
  • Class mainly focused on the use of rhetoric

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Help

  • isn't too hard as long as you follow the general guidelines
  • will help you out a lot if
  • Overall a very good professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four in-person reviews from 2013-2014 are consistent on clarity and manageability, though sample size is modest.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
ENG1A146151 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values