AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Ian Tingen

PSYCH2 · PSYC2 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you value personality and if you need polished lecture clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing instructorHilarious and relatableUnprofessional language complaintsHelpful outside classResearch Methods split
  • Reviews are sharply split between love and strong dislike.
  • , and .
  • , and poor teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Supporters say you do well with effort and help-seeking, but no free-A claims appear.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Research Methods is described as difficult content made fun by some and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Two glowing recommendations are .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Comments stress effort and help more than harsh or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not a dominant theme; success is tied more to effort and asking for help.

Format shift

In-person comments focus more on teaching style than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Half the class finds him hilarious and helpful; .

Format shift

Teaching quality is highly polarized in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so assessment mix remains average.

Format shift

In-person comments lack detailed assessment breakdown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PSYC2 is polarizing: half call him amazing and .

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching professionalism and .

What students said

“Professor Tingen was so much fun. He's the .”
PSYC2
“Doesn't have a . Definitely not professional, he curses during the class”
PSYCH2
“He's awful. Very bad teacher. Go with another instructor, you will be glad you did.”
PSYC2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students discuss teaching , so .

Limited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam format details.

Unclear exam policy
“Research Methods is a difficult subject, but he actually made it fun.”
PSYC2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Tingen is a terrific instructor! He's hilarious, down to earth, approachable... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized personality and teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Personality Split

52/100

“He's , and (possibly) prone to using the occasional cat meme in his lectures.”

🚫

20/100

“He's awful. Very bad teacher. Go with another instructor, you will be glad you did.”

🤝 Help and Effort

75/100

“as long as you put in the effort and/or ask him for help, you'll do well.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • really relatable
  • curses during the class

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • Amazing teacher
  • Doesn't have a
  • Very bad teacher

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Success

  • Research Methods is a difficult subject, but he actually made it fun
  • put in the effort and/or ask him for help, you'll do well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent-era 2013-2014 in-person reviews are detailed but strongly polarized, lowering certainty of a single experience.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC22 reviews
PSYCH22 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1