AI Rate Professor

English

P Brennen

WRITING · ENG1A · ENGLIVILA · ENG1 · 1A · ENG200 · ENG100 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if and ; skip if you need a soft grader.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExpectationsHard GraderBelittling HumorOptional AttendanceEssay Focused
  • Students and helpful versus rude and belittling.
  • as manageable if you follow directions and do the work.
  • Attendance is frequently optional, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students say doing homework and the , though some call him a .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Coursework centers on clear essay prompts with .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Multiple students and treat that as a plus.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Strong fans praise learning and clarity while critics warn about rudeness and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Reviews swing between easy pass and , so grades reward following his exact standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Main load is about .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and willing to help, but belittling humor and inconsistency drag the experience down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; many praise clarity and easy essays while others flag belittling comments and .

Main concern

Personality .

What students said

“if you attend class and do the work you will get an A!”
ENG1A
“ , but have to agree he is belittling.”
ENG1A
“Soo rude picks .”
ENGLIVILA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe formal exams and instead focus on essays, so .

Essay HeavyLittle Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mainly discuss essays rather than proctored exams, so .

Essay AssignmentsUnclear Exam Format
“There is but the main assignments are 4 essays that are very easy!”
ENG1A
“4 easy essays though, bot too long.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you attend class and do the work you will get an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2013, balancing praise for clarity against concerns about harsh tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

58/100

“ and is always willing to help.”

⚖️

48/100

“ but fair.”

😤 Personality Risk

40/100

“He is very belittling and makes you feel like crap if you say something wrong.”

📅

82/100

“ . plus during power outages, he is hilarious with his lighter!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I have learned more from this professor than any other teacher ever encountered.
  • Talks a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the homework and you will pass with eaze.
  • and belittling
  • 4 easy essays though, bot too long.

Theme 3

😤 About Personality

  • Soo rude picks on everyone

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but no recent data and polarized tone.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENG2004 reviews
1A1 review
ENG11 review
ENG1001 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLIVILA1 review
WRITING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values