AI Rate Professor

English

C Jackson

ENG1A · ENG1A1B · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISH200 · ENG200 · ENG1B · WR1B · ENGLISH1B · ENGLISH · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already write at a high level and can handle harsh criticism.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh essay graderRude and condescendingOld-school EnglishSAT-style testsAttendance preached
  • Many students describe her as rude, insulting, and demeaning in class
  • and mechanics despite some saying content is doable
  • A minority of strong writers pass fine, but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even students who call the class cake say papers must be nearly perfect and she marks tiny mechanical errors hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but volume of essays and strict standards raise the challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students say you must show up, cannot be late, and she lectures absentees heavily.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

A clear majority report rude treatment and ; only a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and little credit for strengths.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but 7-8 essays plus midterm and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some call her knowledgeable, but many say she scolds, insults, and fails to teach supportively.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Course is essay-driven with and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English and SAT-style testing, with frequent complaints about harsh tone and grading.

Main concern

Rude classroom style and miserable.

What students said

“RUDE, ARROGANT, CONDESENDING, POMPOUS, NEGATIVE”
ENG200
“the class is easy but she makes it harder than it should be. She just grades the papers so hard.”
ENG1A
“you cant be late, u have to show up, u and if u dont, YOU FAIL!”
ENG1A1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and finals, including hard multiple-choice and essay components.

Essay-heavy courseSAT-style questionsTimed MC and essay examsIn-class essays

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe 7-8 essays plus midterm/final with timed MC and essay writing.

7-8 essays60 hard MC in 40 minutesIn-class essaysSAT II style tests
“who the hell said the midterm/final was easy 60 hard MC Q's in 40 minutes and one essay”
ENG1A
“Three 1,000 word essays... .”
ENG1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . She was mean.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: High.

😤 Classroom Climate

25/100

“RUDE, ARROGANT, CONDESENDING, POMPOUS, NEGATIVE”

📝

22/100

“believe me she will mark you off if you put a comma in the wrong place!”

👎 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ if you paid me.”

📚 Workload Shape

48/100

“Very little hw, but there are like 7-8 essays (like 2-3 wks apart).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very boring teacher who never ever ever lets you leave early
  • She does not feel the need to teach any material, only to criticize
  • experienced and knowledagble educator

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She just grades the papers so hard.
  • If you try you'll get an A.

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • She puts people down, and is a very bitter old woman.
  • Calls you names. LOUSY ATTITUDE TERRIBLE TEACHER AWFUL
  • ; Very insulting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

24 mostly consistent negative in-person reviews with recurring themes on rudeness and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 57
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENGLISH1B4 reviews
ENG1B3 reviews
ENG2002 reviews
ENG1A1B1 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH2001 review
WR1B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values