AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

K. Stagg

MATH8 · MATH7 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Solid option if you want a , but expect some personality quirks and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyWilling to helpMemorable lecturesMakes math funTemperamentalMixed reviews
  • Two of three students praise her help and ability to make math understandable and fun.
  • One older review calls her unprofessional, angry, and .
  • She stepped in mid-semester and still earned strong praise for caring about students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Comments say the class is not super easy and , so an A takes real work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty ratings trend low-moderate and she makes math easier to understand for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students praise her help and teaching, despite one strongly negative review.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No grade details given; one student found tests difficult while .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not heavily discussed; difficulty ratings sit around moderate.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority say she helps, makes math fun, and cares, offset by one claim of anger and unprofessionalism.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests are the main assessment detail mentioned; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly liked her help and fun style, with one sharp complaint about anger and .

Main concern

Occasional unprofessional tone and difficult tests for some students.

What students said

“She was absolutely amazing. Not super easy, but she makes the class fun and cares about students.”
MATH7
“always willing to help before or after class”
MATH8
“Unprof., completely useless. Cusses in class, gets angry when .”
MATH8

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One student says tests are difficult; .

Difficult tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention difficult tests but .

Difficult tests
“ .”
MATH8

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was absolutely amazing. Not super easy, but she makes the class fun and cares about students. And she makes math easier to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews (2006-2007), highlighting mixed teaching praise and one strong complaint. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She was absolutely amazing. Not super easy, but she makes the class fun and cares about students.”

🤝 Helpfulness

78/100

“always willing to help before or after class”

⚠️ Temper Concerns

35/100

“Cusses in class, gets angry when .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes the class fun and cares about students
  • makes math easier to understand
  • the things she says are so strange you don’t forget them

Theme 2

📈

  • Not super easy
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 2

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Tone

  • Cusses in class, gets angry when students don't grasp concepts
  • Unprof., completely useless.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three very old reviews from 2006-2007 with mixed views and little grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH82 reviews
MATH71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values