AI Rate Professor

Education

Christina Nigrelli

CD1111 · CD123 · CDES101 · CD127 · CD8523 · CD133 · CD101 · CDE123 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you need the CD , and will chase every instruction detail yourself.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing instructorUnclear instructionsHeavy assignmentsSlow email repliesHarsh zeros
  • and and chaotic.
  • Workload and development courses.
  • Unclear directions and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even when content , and easy point loss make an A costly.

All analyzed reviews are In person-tagged.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Material is often useful but and .

Difficulty comments come only from In person-tagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; online and hybrid-style work dominate many comments.

Evidence is limited within the In person-tagged set.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Roughly half love her support and content; the other half urge avoidance over stress and confusion.

Split recommendations appear across In person-tagged reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report easy zeros for , and little make-up flexibility.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and frequent assignments are common complaints and even some praise notes.

Format shift

Workload intensity is described only in In person-tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Supportive and ; , and stressful for many others.

Format shift

Teaching quality is highly polarized in In person-tagged reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Portfolios, long papers, observations, and weekly work dominate more than classic exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Reviews are sharply split between praise for kindness, weekend support, and strong course content versus complaints about disorganization, unclear online instructions, harsh zeros, and .

Main concern

, and non-responsiveness can tank grades despite effort.

What students said

“The instructor was amazing, so nice and answered all of my questions even over the weekend.”
CD123
“ . She is cold and unresponsive.”
CD127
“Not a hard class, but CONFUSING. None of .”
CD101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix midterms with long papers or portfolios; and poorly documented.

Mixed Midterm FormatsLong Final PaperStudy Guide Mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Some midterms use mixed item types while finals or .

Mixed Midterm FormatsLong Final PaperStudy Guide Mismatch
“The . One would expect the same for the . This is a paper she posted on line and it has taken me almost 10 hours”
CDES101
“The for what is actually on the test”
CD101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . Doesn't answer e-mails!”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting polarization on support versus disorganization. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️

75/100

“ and will meet with anyone who needs additional support”

📉 Organization Problems

25/100

“ ... ”

📝

28/100

“This course is a lot of work but really great information.”

🚫 Recommendation Split

42/100

“I will never take Christina Nigrelli's class again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wonderful instructor.
  • Very unroganized, never answers questions
  • She is cold and unresponsive
  • extremely caring about each student

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but
  • Gave me a 0 for missing a small part of a BIG assignment
  • THIS TEACHER IS HARD, AND IS MEAN
  • I ended up working very hard for a B

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • answered all of my questions even over the weekend
  • No e-mail response
  • she only emails back if she feels like it
  • Doesn't answer e-mails!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two detailed but older reviews show a and workload.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CD1019 reviews
CDES1014 reviews
CD1273 reviews
CD1232 reviews
CD11111 review
Show 3 more courses
CD1331 review
CD85231 review
CDE1231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values