AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Courtney Cecale

ANTHR1 · ANTHR2 · ANTH2 · ANTH1 · CULTANTH · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Strong pick for anthro GE if you attend, use her study guides, and ; expect a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExtra credit heavyHelpful and responsiveStudy-guide testsStraightforward lecturesMostly easy A
  • Most students find her helpful, smart, and .
  • Tests often match study guides and .
  • A minority say lectures go too fast or that she can seem rude when challenged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students call it a pretty easy A with , and an easy ethnography project.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though some sections and the .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

75/100

; attending still helps because tests follow class talk.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most reviews recommend her for social science credit despite a and clarity complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Tons of , and easy projects make strong grades very reachable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

, and class-based prep; textbook is often optional.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Majority call her amazing, smart, and helpful; .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of a couple of tests with essay items, one project, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person anthro classes are mostly praised as interesting and fair, with , and easy projects.

Main concern

Some report confusing fast PowerPoints, hard finals, or oral presentations with strangers.

What students said

“She gives TONS of opportunities! She is just an amazing teacher!”
ANTH1
“pretty easy A.”
CULTANTH
“Goes way too fast on the powerpoints,which are worded in such a .”
ANTH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests closely follow study guides and in-class material, with and heavy .

Study guide matches testsClass discussion based examsExtra creditEssay questions with emailed examples

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture talk; some report a and essay items.

Study-guide testsEssay questionsHard final (some sections)
“ .”
ANTH1
“ but cool class.”
CULTANTH
“ and she will email you back with .”
ANTH2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives TONS of opportunities! She is just an amazing teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting , clarity, and mixed lecture pace. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“I absolutely love Prof. Cecale's class. and really really smart.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

78/100

“pretty easy A.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's also got , and exams.
  • prof c was really interesting. lots of fun discussions.
  • Goes way too fast on the powerpoints.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She gives TONS of opportunities!
  • pretty easy A.
  • but cool class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • if you have any questions, she emails right away.
  • and helpful if you talk to her after class!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Ten mostly consistent in-person reviews from 2011-2012 provide solid detail, though the sample is modest and older.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHR13 reviews
ANTH22 reviews
ANTHR22 reviews
CULTANTH2 reviews
ANTH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values