AI Rate Professor

Biology

A. Mcwhorter

MCDB60 · ANATIDK · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Evidence is too thin and split; proceed only if you can confirm current teaching style and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditWants You to SucceedMixed ReviewsSubjective GradingAnatomy Heavy Study
  • One glowing anatomy review praises kindness, , and reachable 100% with hard study.
  • Another review calls her unenthusiastic, contemptuous of students, and subjective in grading.
  • With only two old reviews, the overall picture is unstable and highly course-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

One student earned 100% with hard anatomy study and , not a zero-effort free A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but anatomy still requires real study even when teaching support is strong.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student strongly praises her; another says enrolling puts you at her mercy.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

helps in one course, while another .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Anatomy still requires hard study; workload is not described as featherlight.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Split between amazing, success-focused teaching and cold, unenthusiastic classroom management.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and appear; broader method details are thin.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one calls her an amazing anatomy professor with , the other warns of poor classroom management and .

Main concern

Highly inconsistent student experience and very small sample size.

What students said

“Amazing professor! . id given for and lab practical.”
ANATIDK
“She has little enthusiasm for the subject being taught and her contempt for students is easily evident.”
MCDB60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Anatomy assessments include lecture tests and .

Lecture TestsLab PracticalsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person anatomy uses lecture tests and .

Lecture TestsLab PracticalsExtra Credit
“ id given for and lab practical. I got 100% in my class”
ANATIDK

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing professor! . id given for and lab practical.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews, highlighting support versus climate concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🌟

85/100

“Amazing professor! .”

⚠️ Classroom Climate Warning

20/100

“her contempt for students is easily evident”

📊 Path

70/100

“ id given for and lab practical. I got 100% in my class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • wants you to succeed
  • little enthusiasm for the subject being taught
  • lack of skill shows in the way she manages her classroom

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you have to study hard. come on! ITS ANATOMY
  • I got 100% in my class and i would not say that i am a genius
  • much more subjective in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from 2010-2012 make any score highly uncertain.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANATIDK1 review
MCDB601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values