AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Barbara Luther

ESL335 · ESL81 · ESLENG · ESL358 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students overwhelmingly report a hostile, unhelpful ESL experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude to studentsMakes fun of studentsUnclear teachingDisorganizedHarsh grader
  • Multiple students call her mean, rude, and say she mocks students in class.
  • Teaching is described as , and unhelpful for ESL learners.
  • Difficulty is consistently maxed out with little path to success reported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students say you can never satisfy her and there is no realistic path to pass, let alone earn an A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty ratings are maxed and comments describe expectations far above student level with .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, but one student warns never to be late and the tone is strict.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every review and poor teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report impossible standards, no way to pass, and constant dissatisfaction with work.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload volume is less emphasized than hostility and poor instruction; textbooks are used.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Comments focus on mean behavior, mockery, personal digressions, and inability to teach.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews give little concrete assessment mix beyond tough overall standards and textbooks.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as hostile and ineffective, with only one older note calling the class interesting if you are never late.

Main concern

Rudeness, mockery of students, and .

What students said

“She is the . She is mean, unuseful and she always makes fun of students in class”
ESL81
“The most terrible instructor I ever had in my life. She is rude and does not even know how to teach.”
ESL335
“She is so tough & impolite. She expects you more than your level. Her teaching method is awful.”
ESLENG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; only overall harsh difficulty is clear.

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or open-book policies.

“No way to pass her class.”
ESLENG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the . She is mean, unuseful and she always makes fun of students in class, in a very rude way.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting hostility and poor ESL instruction. Credibility rating: Medium.

😤 Teaching Quality

18/100

“The most terrible instructor I ever had in my life. She is rude and does not even know how to teach.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ”

🧱 Difficulty & Passing

18/100

“No way to pass her class.”

Theme 1

😠 About Classroom Climate

  • She always makes fun of students in class, in a very rude way
  • She is so tough & impolite
  • She doesn't sympathize with anybody

Theme 2

📚 About Teaching Quality

  • Her teaching method is awful
  • She usually talks about her personal life

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed but old (2009-2011) reviews are highly consistent on rudeness and poor teaching, with limited recent data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL3351 review
ESL3581 review
ESL811 review
ESLENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values