AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Camille D'Esopo

APPPSYCHE160 · APSY140 · APSY161A · PSYCH161 · PSYCH140 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you want career-life guidance and and lots of .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorUnclear expectationsHeavy homeworkLife guidance focusPolarizing teaching
  • Strong personal mentoring on career and life goals for some students
  • Multiple complaints of and heavy workload
  • Mixed teaching quality with both glowing and harsh reviews

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some students earned an A with effort, but and heavy journals make the A cost real work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is applied and supportive for many, but workload and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Half the class loved her mentoring; and overload.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student got a surprise D on a late assignment yet still finished with an A overall.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report journals multiple times per short term and tons of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Warm career mentoring for some, but and empowerment talk over teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and end-of-term assignments more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person applied psych courses mix warm mentoring with and heavy journals or homework.

Main concern

and too much assigned work relative to perceived learning.

What students said

“The most awesome instructor, helped me reach my academic and personal goals.”
APSY140
“ as to what she wants from you! Way too much assigned work”
APSY161A
“there was tons of HW. Most of the things we did in or out of class were not explained well at all.”
APPPSYCHE160

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Limited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on journals and homework; exams are not clearly described.

Assignment-heavy
“You have to write a journal telling how you apply what she has taught you 4x in an 8 week class”
APSY161A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really cared about us and truly wanted us to figure out what we wanted to do with our lives.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2011; credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Mentoring Strength

80/100

“The most awesome instructor, helped me reach my academic and personal goals.”

📚 Workload Friction

28/100

“Way too much assigned work for a class that is supposed to be about studying techniques.”

❓ Clarity Issues

40/100

“ as to what she wants from you!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as to what she wants from you!
  • Most of the things we did in or out of class were not explained well at all.
  • Great teacher! So glad I took her class before other classes.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She really cared about us and truly wanted us to figure out what we wanted to do with our lives.
  • I cant thank her enough!!
  • she was a .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I still can't figure how I deserved a D on it. Oh well, I still got an A in the class.
  • Way too much assigned work
  • there was tons of HW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five old reviews (2005-2011) with mixed tone and limited grade or policy detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

APPPSYCHE1601 review
APSY1401 review
APSY161A1 review
PSYCH1401 review
PSYCH1611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values