AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Sandra Hayes

INT110 · ID110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

and real-world design knowledge, but do not expect polished teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AField KnowledgeableTeaching Skills LackingAdult Learner FriendlyOutdated Content
  • Easy A with light project work and low difficulty.
  • Strong industry knowledge but mixed teaching skill reviews.
  • design intro.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Multiple students call it an Easy A with light projects and little effort beyond showing up.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Average difficulty is very low and comments describe fun, light fundamentals rather than heavy concepts.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Attendance is not labeled mandatory, but students say showing up and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students praise helpfulness and knowledge, though one strong review warns it is a waste if you want real teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly frame the class as an Easy A with light project effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload centers on a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Knowledgeable and caring industry voice, but several students say teaching skill is weak or outdated.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize projects and class participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person ID fundamentals feel fun and easy with , and mixed views on teaching skill versus outdated content.

Main concern

Some students say teaching is weak or outdated if you want serious interior design learning.

What students said

“Show up to class, put a little time into your projects (3 of them) and enjoy yourself. Easy A.”
ID110
“If you truly want to learn about ! She is very out dated, and does not know how to teach.”
ID110
“This teacher is truly a gem. Here past experience, thought not totally modern technology, does give you the fundementals of Interior Design.”
INT110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and focus on projects instead.

Project-BasedLittle Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mainly discuss projects.

Project-Based
“Show up to class, put a little time into your projects (3 of them) and enjoy yourself. Easy A.”
ID110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class, put a little time into your projects (3 of them) and enjoy yourself. Easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2011, highlighting easy grading, field knowledge, and teaching quality concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy A Path

88/100

“On the other hand if you want an easy A, go for it.”

📚 Industry Knowledge

75/100

“she is very knowledgable of the field, and very helpful.”

⚠️ Teaching Gaps

40/100

“She is very out dated, and does not know how to teach.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • while her teaching skills may be lacking, she is very knowledgable of the field
  • She's a total sweetheart!
  • This teacher is truly a gem.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A.
  • Although there was a lot to do the text book was not used much.
  • if you want an easy A, go for it.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She gave me the courage to go back to school
  • She doesn't tolerate that.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed but older in-person reviews from 2008-2011 with mixed teaching opinions and no grade data.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ID1104 reviews
INT1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values