AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Alda Babusek

NUR170 · N171 · N170CLINICAL · INTROINTR · N170LECTURE · N170 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Fine for , but be cautious if you land her as a clinical instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring with first-yearsPolarizing clinicalTests from notesNeeds preparationMixed clinical support
  • if students prepare, read, and use study resources.
  • Clinical reputation and harsh, inconsistent instruction.
  • do syllabus , and test from notes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades look reachable if , and study notes, but clinical and first-semester pressure still demand real effort.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Material is first-semester nursing level and often called manageable, though clinical intensity and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do , though class and clinical presence is implied as expected.

in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and fairness, while others warn against her clinical style and lack of passion.

and clinical reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Several students call her fair and note-based on tests, but clinical judgment issues hurt trust for others.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect , and clinical prep.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Caring and supportive for some first-semester students, but others report poor clinical teaching, unprepared lectures, and harsh tone.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of lecture tests from notes, syllabus assignments, case studies, skills labs, and clinical evaluation.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person nursing students often find lecture manageable and her caring, but and inconsistent.

Main concern

, and weak prep for hospital work.

What students said

“Fine for lecture, but the !”
N170
“Really liked ”
N171
“I really enjoyed Alda. and very non-threatening”
N170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests mostly track notes and assigned work; reviews .

Tests from notesSyllabus fill-insCase studies

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say tests come mostly from notes if you complete syllabus work and case studies.

Tests from notesSyllabus assignmentsCase studies
“Do your syllabus, fill in the blanks,& case studies. !”
NUR170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fine for lecture, but the ! Alda frequently makes mistakes in what she tells the students to do, then yells at them when they do as theyre told.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person nursing reviews, balancing lecture support against clinical criticism. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“ and very non-threatening... especially for a first semester student's first day at the hospital!”

⚠️ Clinical Risk

25/100

“Fine for lecture, but the !”

📘 Prep Path

62/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Alda really cares
  • .

Theme 2

🏥 About Clinical Experience

  • Easy to work with in clinicals.
  • Needs to retire.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Prep

  • !
  • Record her lectures & relisten to them

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten older in-person reviews from 2005-2011 show recurring themes but are outdated and split between lecture and clinical contexts.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N1704 reviews
N170LECTURE2 reviews
INTROINTR1 review
N170CLINICAL1 review
N1711 review
Show 1 more courses
NUR1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values