AI Rate Professor

Physics

Larry Oldewurlte

PHYS4A · 4A · PHYS2A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Run away unless you have no alternative and already excel at hard physics.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAvoidExtremely DifficultThin ReviewsPoor Teaching Reputation
  • All three reviews rate quality very low and difficulty at maximum.
  • Comments are short and purely negative with almost no constructive detail.
  • Students actively tell others to check bad reputation and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Difficulty is maxed in every review and nobody describes a realistic route to a high grade.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Every review lists difficulty as 5 with zero softening comments about content ease.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students only express disbelief he still teaches and redirect others to negative reviews elsewhere.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; overall tone implies a very hard grade path.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews give max difficulty with no light-workload comments, implying a heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Comments are bluntly negative and provide no positive teaching moments.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Sparse in-person Physics reviews are uniformly negative, calling him terrible and hard without explaining how to succeed.

Main concern

Almost no path to success is described; reviews only warn others away.

What students said

“I CANT BELIEVVE SHE IS STILL TEACHING!!”
PHYS2A
“Terrible.”
PHYS4A
“CHECH HIS REVIEWS AT IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE”
4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or policies.

“Terrible.”
PHYS4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I CANT BELIEVVE SHE IS STILL TEACHING!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 sparse in-person reviews with uniformly negative tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“I CANT BELIEVVE SHE IS STILL TEACHING!!”

🔥 Difficulty

10/100

“Terrible.”

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“CHECH HIS REVIEWS AT IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE”

Theme 1

⚠️ Overall Warning

  • I CANT BELIEVVE SHE IS STILL TEACHING!!
  • Terrible.
  • CHECH HIS REVIEWS AT IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three very short, old, consistently negative reviews with almost no detail or grade evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

4A1 review
PHYS2A1 review
PHYS4A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values