AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Ed Tackett

MFG200 · RAPDPROT289 · RP289 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you want real industry access and strong mentorship.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIndustry connectedLab access anytimeJob helpChill expertHands-on projects
  • , and projects anytime
  • Deep industry ties and helps students land jobs
  • Students urge taking his classes while you can

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Difficulty ratings are very low and students describe him as chill and highly supportive, though grades are not listed.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

85/100

Average difficulty is very low and comments stress support and access rather than conceptual struggle.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students say try and take his classes now and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Very low difficulty scores and , though no letter grades are given.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students emphasize open lab help and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

All quality ratings are high; students praise constant help, industry expertise, and career support.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on lab work, product design, and projects rather than formal exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person manufacturing and rapid prototyping students rave about open lab help, industry knowledge, and job connections with low difficulty.

Main concern

Reviews are old and one has no comment text, so current course load may differ.

What students said

“Ed is awesome. He will help you with anything you need. You can go into the lab anytime and he will help you design your products and projects.”
MFG200
“Really chill for a guy who is head of the industry nationwide.”
MFG200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on labs and projects and do .

Project basedLab work

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and project design without proving exam policies.

Project basedLab work
“You can go into the lab anytime and he will help you design your products and projects.”
MFG200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ed is awesome. He will help you with anything you need. You can go into the lab anytime and he will help you design your products and projects. He knows a lot about this industry and is a good person to know. He also try's and helps students get jobs within the industry. Taking MFG 201 next semester with him as well. Try and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting mentorship and industry access. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Ed is awesome. He will help you with anything you need.”

🏭 Industry Access

95/100

“He also try's and helps students get jobs within the industry.”

👍 Recommendation

95/100

“Try and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can go into the lab anytime and he will help you design your products and projects.
  • Really chill for a guy who is head of the industry nationwide.

Theme 2

💼 About Career Value

  • He also try's and helps students get jobs within the industry.
  • Very in touch with with companies utilizing rapid prototyping.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistently positive in-person reviews across related courses, but all are from 2006-2009 with thin grade detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MFG2002 reviews
RAPDPROT2891 review
RP2891 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values