AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Allen

MATH8 · MATH253 · M · MANY · MATH3A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you want a clear, supportive math teacher who makes hard concepts approachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCrystal Clear ExplanationsMath Confidence BuilderFair GraderLots of HomeworkSaint for Strugglers
  • Most students call him one of the best math teachers for .
  • and lots of homework build comfort for later math courses.
  • One early outlier called notes horrible and dropped; nearly all others are glowing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Fair exams and homework help grades, but lots of HW means you still need consistent effort for an A.

All evidence comes from 9 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

He makes algebra and intermediate math easy to understand for students who usually dislike math.

All evidence comes from 9 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All evidence comes from 9 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Eight of nine quality ratings are 5s with repeated best-math-teacher and will-miss-him language.

All evidence comes from 9 in-person reviews; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students call him a great grader who grades exams and homework fairly.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Several reviews note a lot of homework that builds skill for later courses.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

and personality repeatedly convert math-avoiders into fans.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of homework, chapter tests, and exams with .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person math reviews overwhelmingly , and confidence-building teaching, with .

Main concern

Heavy homework load and one report of poor notes in a harder course.

What students said

“ .”
MATH8
“he graded his exams and homework fairly. Alot of HW though”
MATH253
“I dropped this class. His notes are horrible, but .”
MATH3A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and chapter tests are described as fair without mention of strict proctoring tools.

Fair ExamsChapter TestsHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention fair exams, homework, and chapter tests without proctoring details.

Fair ExamsChapter Tests
“he graded his exams and homework fairly.”
MATH253
“ .”
MATH3A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AMAZING Teacher. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting crystal-clear math teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“best math teacher i have ever had.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“I will definetly miss the guy.”

⚖️

78/100

“He's a and answers all questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He explained things so well i wanted to go home to do my homework

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Alot of HW though, but it helped me become comfortable
  • he's a saint
  • I dropped this class. His notes are horrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

9 reviews spanning 2003-2009 with strong consistency on clarity and fairness, though all are old and one is empty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH84 reviews
MATH2532 reviews
M1 review
MANY1 review
MATH3A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values