AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Amanda Firestone

NURS172 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Solid choice for nursing students who want a and can self-check care plan details.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy GoingHelpfulSupportiveGentle FeedbackNursing Care Plans
  • Easygoing and helpful nursing instructor who does not push students hard
  • Supportive and nice classroom presence with quality around 4/5
  • Students want more critical

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Low difficulty and a light-touch style make an A reachable without heavy pressure, though .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty rated 2/5 and the instructor does not push hard, so content feels approachable.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Students describe her as helpful and for .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Does not push hard and students report doing well, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Does not push students too hard; main work mentioned is care plans rather than heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Helpful and easygoing presence; .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Care plans are the main assessment focus mentioned in comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person NURS172 felt easygoing and but .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ . Very nice person to be around.”
NURS172

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No clear exam policy is described; .

“Could use more correcting on the care plans, I did good on all of them but I know there were things that could have been corrected on them.”
NURS172

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Very nice person to be around.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting supportiveness and . Credibility rating: Low.

😊 Easygoing Support

76/100

“ . Very nice person to be around.”

📝

55/100

“I wish she would have been a little more into correcting what we did wrong.”

👍 Solid Quality

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📋

  • Could use more correcting on the care plans
  • I wish she would have been a little more into correcting what we did wrong.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old 2009 in-person review with moderate detail limits reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS1721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values