AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Chase Way

PHIL160 · PHIL201F · PHIL202 · PHIL201 · PHIL100F · PHIL170F · PHIL172F · PHIL170 · PHIL100 · PHIL160F · 84 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
97.65%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a kind, flexible philosophy professor and can keep up with and written work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and understandingEasy A with effortReading and discussion heavyClear and engagingFlexible grading
  • Students describe her as , and supportive.
  • Grades are very attainable because , and extensions or reattempts are common.
  • The main tradeoff is frequent .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

High grades are very common because , and students often get reattempts, extensions, or manageable exams.

Online reviews emphasize reattempts and flexible submissions, while , and fair grading.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Philosophy can involve reading, but students , and engaging.

Online courses rely more on modules and worksheets, while and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

86/100

Reviews emphasize accommodations, extensions, and .

In-person reviews mention missing class without trouble, while online reviews show strong flexibility with deadlines and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

, and a positive learning experience.

Both online and , though a few online reviews criticize busy work or instructor absence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Students repeatedly mention fair grading, extensions, multiple attempts, reattempts, and easy paths to an A.

Format shift

Online reviews show reattempts and full credit after communication, while and manageable finals.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is steady with readings, quizzes, discussions, worksheets, and papers, but most students call it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews more often describe weekly modules and busy work, while , and discussions.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students overwhelmingly describe her as , and deeply supportive.

Format shift

and class energy, while online reviews praise organization, responsiveness, and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear driven mostly , and essays, with exams less dominant.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, worksheets, discussions, and movie papers, while , and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing fun , and flexible deadlines.

Main concern

Students should expect , and active engagement.

What students said

“Far and away the .”
PHIL172F
“The but given multiple attempts).”
PHIL172F
“Plenty of work to be done but if you give a strong effort in learning the material, you will get a good grade.”
PHIL201F

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are very strong overall, with students , and an easy path to high grades.

Main concern

Online courses can include lots of , and occasional busy-work complaints.

What students said

“She also allows multiple reattempts on nearly all of .”
PHIL100F
“I recieved full credit just by letting her know through emails.”
PHIL100F
“ and felt like busy-work; majority were fill-in-the-blanks of youtube video transcripts.”
PHIL100F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

When exams are described, they are usually student-friendly through open-book tests, no time limits, multiple attempts, or paper alternatives.

Open Book TestsNo Time Limit ExamsMultiple AttemptsManageable FinalMovie Papers Instead of Midterm

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention weekly quizzes, online open-note textbook quizzes, a , and essays as major grade components.

Online Open-Notes Textbook QuizzesMultiple AttemptsManageable FinalEssay-Based Grading
“The but given multiple attempts).”
PHIL172F
“It's hybrd so she .”
PHIL172F
“Prompts for the semester.”
PHIL172F

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention open-book tests, no time-limit exams, quizzes, and , but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Open Book TestsNo Time Limit ExamsWeekly QuizzesMovie Papers Instead of Midterm
“Do the , but at least open book.”
PHIL201
“The .”
PHIL160
“we were to write 3 mini papers on different movies in place of a midterm!”
PHIL100F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Far and away the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“Far and away the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If and Professor Way is an .”

⚖️ Easy A Potential

93/100

“As long as and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and treats everyone fairly.
  • She made every class enjoyable and fun while still managing to pack them full of top-quality material.
  • Professor and made every week's modules relate back to real world problems.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is a LOT of readings but they are manageable.
  • Every week, there will be reading, watching crash course vids while , and quizzes.
  • There is a good chunk of work but so long as you show progress you're good

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Flexibility

  • She was very understanding when I missed a and gave me .
  • .
  • She gave me a couple of and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

84

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and both formats are detailed and highly consistent despite a few negative outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 579
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL100F15 reviews
PHIL172F9 reviews
PHIL1008 reviews
PHIL201F6 reviews
PHIL1704 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PHIL160F2 reviews
PHIL170F2 reviews
PHIL2012 reviews
PHIL1601 review
PHIL2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

46

A+ 24 · A 22

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values