AI Rate Professor

Economics

Franny Chan

ECON100 · ECON101 · ECON102 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
47.22%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can study independently and use , because teaching clarity is inconsistent.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtra CreditOpen Note ExamsConfusing LecturesTest HeavyMixed Teaching Quality
  • Chan receives sharply mixed reviews, with some students finding her caring and others .
  • and open-note exams can make grades manageable for organized students.
  • A , and exams that may not match lectures well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, and open-note exams can help, but students still warn that and require studying.

In-person reviews give more evidence of open-note exams and , while online reviews show stricter exams and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Economics content is not always described as inherently hard, but and .

Online reviews make the course sound harder because of videos and exams, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Participation and attendance often affect grades through discussions, quizzes, assignments, or .

and participation more, while online reviews emphasize deadlines and late-work rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend her when they like her examples and , but many advise avoiding her because of and exams.

Online evidence is notably more negative, while and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and open-note exams help, but and point deductions keep grading from feeling truly lenient.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention strict policies and harder exams.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is usually manageable through discussions, quizzes, assignments, and reading, though some students call the .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, exams, and deadlines, while and participation work.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She can be caring and practical, but many students say .

Format shift

Online teaching is reviewed more harshly, while signs.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Grades rely heavily on exams, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention exams, but online reviews specify quizzes and exams while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with recent students praising and open-note exams while older reviews criticize and harsh tests.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and .

What students said

“Homework is optional and in classroom.”
ECON101
“Material on the .”
ECON101

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing Lockdown Browser, unclear videos, strict late policies, and poor learning value.

Main concern

Students often say they struggled to understand lectures and exams online.

What students said

“She uses lockdown browser for exams.”
ECON101
“stay away from this course if you want to learn anything.”
ECON101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies because , while online reviews include Lockdown Browser and strict testing.

Open Note ExamsTake-Home ExamsLockdown BrowserTricky TestsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an open-note in-class final in some sections, but other reviews describe tricky or mismatched exams.

Open Note ExamsTake-Home ExamsIn-Class FinalTricky Tests
“Homework is optional and in classroom.”
ECON101
“the !”
ECON101

Online

Online reviews explicitly , and no makeups, but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Lockdown BrowserTimed ExamsNo MakeupsQuizzes
“She uses lockdown browser for exams.”
ECON101
“80 mins for 50 Qs, some Qs were tricky.”
ECON101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can study independently and use , because teaching clarity is inconsistent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“I had to almost everything.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

48/100

“Good lecturer that gives real world examples.”

⚖️

58/100

“She offer at least 15% .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives real world examples.
  • She often goes off topic to where she won't find her way back to the course material for quite some time.

Theme 2

📈 About Exams and Grades

  • and .
  • Tests were harder, 80 mins for 50 Qs, some Qs were tricky.
  • final ways heavy (40%) though.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Personality

  • Caring and will not hesitate to help students who don't understand.
  • Franny is very friendly and nice.
  • Professor not flexible or forgiving, NO MAKEUPS.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews across many years provide strong evidence, though opinions vary sharply by format and term.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 59
2 out of 56
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ECON10134 reviews
ECON1028 reviews
ECON1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 8 · A- 1

B range

13

B+ 3 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 3 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4