AI Rate Professor

Business

Carlos Antunez

CIS · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can manage an uneven online course and like hands-on CIS work, but be cautious if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHands-On AssignmentsMixed Online SetupHelpful When EngagedTextbook HeavyManageable Workload
  • Antunez has strong positive reviews for practical CIS learning and individual help.
  • Online reviews are polarized, with some praising responsiveness and and poor communication.
  • The class is usually manageable if , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades can be strong when students complete labs, assignments, and reading, but and coding gaps raise the effort cost.

Online reviews show both manageable A paths and frustrating structure, while students.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

CIS content is practical and manageable for organized students, but coding assignments and .

Online evidence stresses labs and course setup, while and homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

There is , though participation is often tagged and online due-date flexibility appears in one strong review.

Online reviews include explicit due-date flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

Students who receive help and , but several online students warn about poor setup and communication.

Online reviews are highly polarized, while but lean positive overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Grades look attainable with completed work, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online reviews include both flexible submissions and tough grading complaints, while .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The , and projects, but several students call it manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize labs and projects, while and textbook-heavy work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He can be helpful, practical, and caring, but online organization and responsiveness problems seriously weaken the experience for some students.

Format shift

Online teaching is polarized, while and one negative warning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews focus mainly on labs, homework, projects, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and approachability, but one review simply advises choosing another teacher.

Main concern

The small sample makes the .

What students said

“He helped me out tremendously and managed to bring up my grade up to a B.”
CIS
“ if you can”
CIS

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online feedback is sharply split between helpful, practical, flexible instruction and and weak communication.

Main concern

Course organization and instructor responsiveness are inconsistent online.

What students said

“he was flexible with due dates and submissions.”
CIS
“Very poorly set up online class.”
CIS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with one in-person review mentioning quizzes and a but .

Study GuideQuizzesFinalAssignment Focused

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or exam difficulty policies.

QuizzesFinal Study Guide
“He even gave us a study guide that made taking the .”
CIS

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very poorly set up online class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He helped me out tremendously and managed to bring up my grade up to a B.”

💻 Online Experience

50/100

“Very poorly set up online class.”

📚 Workload Balance

54/100

“The workload is steady but manageable, and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and I found his responsiveness pretty spot on.
  • .
  • he doesn't help much.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Course Setup

  • They were all interesting and fun to do while being low stakes.
  • Several projects and and had wrong due dates.
  • The

Theme 3

📈 About Work and Grades

  • textbook heavy on the homework, but manageable.
  • There were a good amount of labs and assignments
  • He even gave us a study guide that made taking the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only but a small and polarized sample.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CIS9 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1