AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jane Troop

BUS205 · MATHTUE · CIS105F · CIS100 · CIS100F · MATH123 · CIS106 · BUS151 · CIS111 · CIS123 · BUS101 · BUSWRTN · CIS205 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
21.05%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are already confident with the material and can succeed with little instructor help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationHeavy HomeworkSelf-Taught CourseUnhelpful SupportHarsh Student Experience
  • Most reviews describe weak teaching support, poor communication, and students needing to teach themselves.
  • Workload is often , and assignments.
  • A few older positive reviews praise organization or office hours, but the dominant tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students received A grades, but many say the grade required self-teaching, heavy homework, confusing tests, or little instructor support.

Online grades look especially workload-heavy, while but many support-related failures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content may be basic in some sections, but and poor help make it feel much harder than necessary.

Online students emphasize self-teaching through homework platforms, while and unanswered questions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several reviews say participation, showing up, or in-class work matters, and missing work can sharply hurt the grade.

Attendance pressure appears more clearly in in-person reviews, while and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise against taking her because .

Both formats are negative, with online reviews especially harsh about communication and and classroom treatment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students frequently describe tough grading, confusing tests, low scores despite following instructions, and little clarity on standing.

Format shift

Online reviews mention harsh grading on assignments, while and selective or .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Many reviews cite tons of homework, 11-25 weekly assignments, expensive access systems, and long hours of work.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are strongest, though .

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

The dominant , and students feeling forced to learn independently.

Format shift

Both formats are weak, with online reviews stressing no communication and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to , and online platform work depending on course.

Format shift

Online sections emphasize platform homework and quizzes, while , and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, with repeated complaints about unhelpful answers, , heavy work, and poor treatment of students.

Main concern

Students who need help may struggle because many reviews say questions are not answered well.

What students said

“I received a good grade, but it was NO help from her.”
CIS100F
“She doesn't answer questions, you are doing most of your learning on your own.”
CIS100
“Prof. .”
CIS106

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, describing expensive materials, heavy Cengage-style assignments, poor communication, and weak support.

Main concern

Students often feel they are teaching themselves while .

What students said

“There was no communication from her at all, so it's almost like you are your own professor.”
CIS111
“I spent like 15 hours a week in .”
CIS111
“I didn't have $100+ to spend on an online textbook to access lectures and .”
CIS106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe confusing or poorly aligned tests, with some study guides but policy.

Confusing TestsMidterm and Final MentionedNo Review MentionedStudy Guide MentionedHomework Before Exams Issue

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final study sheet, and participation-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam format.

Confusing TestsNo Review MentionedFinal Study SheetParticipation-Based Points
“There is no review for test, so .”
BUS151
“review the and KNOW IT”
CIS106
“absolutely none of that crap is on the test!”
MATH123

Online

, and exams due before related assignments, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, LockDown Browser, or open-book rules.

Midterm and Final MentionedStudy Guide MentionedQuizzesExams Before Assignments
“ ”
BUS151
“Exams are due before the terrible way to run a class.”
BUS151
“She did give a study guide for midterms and was covered.”
BUS151

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There was no communication from her at all, so it's almost like you are your own professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“I learned nothing and am now stupider for taking her class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“She gave about 11-25 assignments every week on Cengage, which were very time consuming.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ as a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • She does not answer your questions, she takes a as if you are dumb for asking.
  • She doesn't answer questions, you are doing most of your learning on your own.
  • She is excellent at taking the time to help you during her office hours, so go if needed.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • I worked harder in this course than my other 3 courses combined.
  • tons of but one missed homework can absolutely make your grade do down one letter
  • There was no communication from her at all, so it's almost like you are your own professor.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • The average score on her tests are a 31.
  • to the letter but she still gives me low scores.
  • There is no review for test, so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 29 reviews across many years and both formats, with a strong repeated pattern of poor communication and high workload despite some older positive outliers.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 519

Course coverage

BUS1515 reviews
CIS1005 reviews
CIS1064 reviews
CIS1113 reviews
CIS1233 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CIS100F2 reviews
BUS1011 review
BUS2051 review
BUSWRTN1 review
CIS105F1 review
CIS2051 review
MATH1231 review
MATHTUE1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1