AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Arthur Rainey

CIS111 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can learn independently from instructions and tolerate uneven lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy ATedious homeworkDisjointed lecturesBook-guided assignmentsLimited evidence
  • Both reviews report A-level outcomes, but they disagree sharply on teaching quality.
  • The stronger positive review says the class is easy if students follow the book and .
  • The newer negative review describes lectures as disjointed and poorly connected to graded work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Both reported grades are A-range, and one review directly says it is an easy A if .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The work is described as not hard and instruction-following based, though .

Only in-person evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention in-class quizzes but do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews discuss the course, and they do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation confidence is weak because the small review set is split between an easy positive experience and a recent poor teaching experience.

All recommendation evidence is in person; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

A grades are reported, but one review tags tough grading and the evidence is .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and time-consuming, but reviewers say the work is not hard.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with one review praising his demeanor and another calling the lectures disjointed.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Grades appear based on online homework, in-class quizzes, and a and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence suggests an , and a , but lecture quality may be unclear or disconnected.

Main concern

The main concern is that lectures may feel disjointed and not .

What students said

“Lecture heavy but often seems disjointed.”
CIS111
“This class was an easy A.”
CIS111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review describes four small quizzes and a , though evidence is limited.

Four In-Class QuizzesSuper Easy Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention four 20-point quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Four In-Class QuizzesSuper Easy Final
“four 20-point in-class quizzes throughout the semester and .”
CIS111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting limited but conflicting evidence on teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy A Signal

84/100

“This class was an easy A.”

🎯 Teaching Clarity

52/100

“Lecture heavy but often seems disjointed.”

📝 Workload Reality

58/100

“It can become tedious and time-consuming, but it's not hard at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture heavy but often seems disjointed.
  • Professor Rainey was super sweet and humble.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was an easy A.
  • DO THE HOMEWORK.

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessments

  • /Access, and four 20-point in-class quizzes throughout the semester and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two in-person reviews are available, one is from 2015 and the newer one conflicts with it, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS1112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values