AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Mohd Ansari

111A · CHEM111A · 111B · CHEM111AB · CHEM111B · CHEM111AF · 125 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
44%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him only if you can teach yourself chemistry and but demanding grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesSelf-teaching requiredTest heavyCaring but polarizingHeavy workload
  • some praise his care and , while and disorganized.
  • Getting an A is possible, but , and learning outside class.
  • Online reviews are more negative, with repeated complaints about weak structure and self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and self-teaching rather than low effort.

Both formats require major effort, but online reviews describe a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

General chemistry content is demanding, and many students.

, while online students more often say the course becomes self-taught.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as important for passing, even when students feel .

and participation more often, while online reviews focus on lecture access and self-study.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and practice, but many others warn against him because of disorganization and .

In-person recommendations are split, while online recommendations are mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students mention curves and leniency, but many others call him tough and .

Format shift

and , while online reviews lean stricter.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students frequently report lots of , and outside practice.

Format shift

Both formats involve heavy work, with online students especially describing stressful self-study.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

His care and subject knowledge are real, but repeated reports of .

Format shift

In-person teaching has more positive pockets, while online teaching is described as .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly emphasize tests, quizzes, pop quizzes, labs, and .

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy, though and LockDown Browser.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for caring support but frequent criticism of , and .

Main concern

Many students say success depends on outside study because .

What students said

“lectures leave most confused, if ur even studying right.”
111B
“ if overall average is low.”
CHEM111B
“ and based on lectures .”
CHEM111AB

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly , and heavy self-study.

Main concern

Students say the online and limited teaching value.

What students said

“Quizzes and LockDown Browser”
CHEM111A
“You WILL have to teach yourself everything.”
111B
“It is essentially teach yourself.”
111A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students often , and uneven alignment with lectures.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesLockDown Browser MentionedCurves SometimesExam Content Often Challenging

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

curves but inconsistent preparation from lectures.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesCurves SometimesLecture-Based Exams Sometimes
“w/o a an A.”
111B
“ and based on lectures .”
CHEM111AB

Online

Online reviews clearly mention LockDown Browser once and .

LockDown BrowserTest HeavyTough Exams
“Quizzes and LockDown Browser”
CHEM111A
“ .”
CHEM111B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You basically have to re-teach yourself after class to understand what's going on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“His lectures are so disorganized and not at all similar to what is on the exams.”

📚 Effort For Grades

40/100

“An A was possible, but falling behind early in the semester made it hard for me to recover.”

⚖️

45/100

“ if overall average is low.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures leave most confused, if ur even studying right.
  • Professor Ansari did a fantastic job in teaching material, and the you solve in class.
  • His lectures are hard to understand, not very good at explaining the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You do need to put in time outside of class and read the textbook!!
  • This is a tough class if you don’t prepare or put in time.
  • His class is so hard he makes you work way harder for your grade then other professors !

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Ansari really cares about his students and wants everyone to pass the class.
  • He is also very funny.
  • He makes you feel ashamed for asking questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

125

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years with detailed, consistent , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 522
3 out of 525
2 out of 521
1 out of 521

Course coverage

CHEM111B18 reviews
111B13 reviews
CHEM111A8 reviews
111A6 reviews
CHEM111AB3 reviews
Show 1 more courses
CHEM111AF2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

20

A 16 · A- 4

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2