AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Memo Fernandez

ETHS100 · ETHS141 · ETHS101F · ETH101 · ETHS101 · ETHIC101 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you like discussion-heavy ethnic studies and , and weak course organization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingDisorganized GradingDiscussion BasedPassionate but Polarizing
  • Students , and .
  • Positive reviews , and open discussion style.
  • Recent reviews are much more negative than older ones, especially about organization and transparency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A grades, but , and as the real cost.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The subject can be interesting, but the , and unclear lecture support make the course feel challenging.

Only in-person evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as important, and some work must be turned in during class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendations are split, but recent reviews often warn students away because of disorganization, workload, and .

, and the negative tone is strongest in recent in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students frequently call him a and complain that .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Reviews , and extensive weekly reading.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He is praised as passionate and caring by some students, but many describe , poor communication, and disorganization.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix exams, papers, presentations, reading responses, participation, and projects.

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a polarizing class with passionate discussions but , and .

Main concern

The , and a workload that often feels excessive for the course level.

What students said

“Insane amount of work for a 3 credit class.”
ETHS101F
“ teaching history and is a cool guy.”
ETHS101
“Doesn't provide enough info in .”
ETH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, while others describe long exams and a , so exam friendliness varies.

Take-Home ExamsFour ExamsFinal PresentationReading-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but also long exams, multiple exams, and a final presentation in others.

Take-Home ExamsLong Written ExamsFinal Presentation
“The .”
ETHS101
“There are 4 exams plus a 8 page final with presentation.”
ETH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“His lectures are a little all over the place and the .”

⚖️

25/100

“You don't even know what grade you have until the end of the semester”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“It was like a 300ish pg book per week.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Insane amount of work for a 3 credit class.
  • There is lots of , so be prepared and make time for it.
  • Gives you a crazy amount of reading and writing.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Fernandez was an outstanding teacher!
  • Honestly the .
  • Memo keeps it interesting!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • Grades lacked transparency and were reflected by his pre perceived thoughts rather than work summited
  • I got my grade just from asking him what it was the last week of class.
  • He grades easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 35 reviews span many years and consistently repeat the same themes, though older and newer reviews differ in tone.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ETHS10112 reviews
ETH1017 reviews
ETHS101F7 reviews
ETHIC1015 reviews
ETHS1413 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ETHS1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

5

B 5

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3