AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Rosie Kar

WMNS100 · ETHS171 · WMNS25163 · ETHS101 · ETHS170 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
36.11%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her only if you care about the subject and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy readingMany papersLate gradingPassionate contentExtension-friendly
  • Students often find the course content meaningful and the professor passionate.
  • The biggest complaint is a heavy weekly load of readings, videos, discussions, and essays.
  • whether they are meeting expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A good grade is possible by following instructions and submitting the writing, but the time cost and .

In-person reviews show more flexibility and stronger grades, while online reviews more often warn that .

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The concepts are accessible for interested students, but the , and reflective writing make the course demanding.

Online courses feel harder because of volume and self-management, while and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

She appears flexible with extensions and late work in some sections, but participation and keeping up with material still matter.

In-person reviews give clearer evidence of late-work acceptance, while online reviews focus on deadlines and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her for meaningful content and compassion, but because workload and .

In-person recommendation is stronger, while online recommendation is much weaker due to heavy workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some students earn A grades with effort and extensions, but .

Format shift

Online reviews show the strongest grading complaints, while and late-work flexibility.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly describe weekly readings, documentaries, discussion posts, essays, and reflections as too much for a lower-level course.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially overwhelming, while but less consistently criticized.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students often respect her passion and materials, but and workload design significantly hurt the learning experience.

Format shift

In-person teaching is viewed more positively, while online teaching and heavy asynchronous tasks.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews describe discussion posts, reflections, essays, readings, and videos, with .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-focused, and online reviews especially emphasize weekly writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

for lectures, compassion, and late-work flexibility, but workload remains a concern.

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with readings, documentaries, and writing assignments.

What students said

“LATE WORK ACCEPTED. shes the goat.”
ETHS171
“The workload presented was not appropriate for a 100 level class.”
ETHS170

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative or mixed because students report , and .

Main concern

The online workload can feel overwhelming and .

What students said

“She won't grade anything until after the semester is over.”
ETHS170
“this class is like a part time job.”
WMNS100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mainly describe writing assignments and one review explicitly says there was .

No Exams Mentioned In Many ReviewsNo Midterm Or Final In One ReviewDiscussion PostsWeekly ReflectionsEssays

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and documentaries, but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

Writing AssignmentsDocumentary-Based WorkLecture Reflection
“ .”
ETHS171
“ and reflecting on in class discussions.”
ETHS171

Online

Online reviews clearly describe discussion posts, reflections, essays, and one class with , but do not prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

No Midterm Or Final MentionedWeekly ReflectionsDiscussion PostsEssays
“there was just one discussion per week and !”
ETHS170
“ and weekly reflections on the unit learned.”
ETHS170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures and materials are great, but she's a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and learning value. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“She assigns two essays a week, up to ten attached readings with hour long .”

🕒

35/100

“Didn't grade anything until the semester ended, so .”

🎯 Teaching Value

58/100

“I learned so much in this class and honesty enjoyed it.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There was a heavy workload.
  • The workload can get heavy really quickly
  • Too heavy and challenging, and it could have an impact on their other classes.

Theme 2

📝 And Feedback

  • She won't grade anything until after the semester is over.
  • I didn't receive a single grade all semester long
  • , but .

Theme 3

❤️ About Course Value

  • Topics are really interesting and sometimes even inspiring.
  • She is a great mentor that cares for her students.
  • Dr. Kar is absolutely amazing! She is someone who really advocates for students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 36 reviews with strong , and course-content value across formats.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 511
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ETHS17019 reviews
WMNS1008 reviews
ETHS1716 reviews
WMNS251632 reviews
ETHS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 6 · A 10

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 6

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1