AI Rate Professor

Fashion

Renee Young

FASH108 · DRAP209 · FASHIONDESIGN · FASH186 · FASH108A · FAS284A · FASH050F · FASH101 · FASH299 · ALLFASH · FASH150 · FASH093 · 145 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
74.7%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can tolerate uneven organization and learn independently from hands-on fashion work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing InstructorFashion Industry KnowledgeDisorganized CanvasUnclear InstructionsHands-On Learning
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who find Young knowledgeable and inspiring and students who describe her as .
  • Hands-on fashion, pattern, draping, and industry content are praised by many positive reviewers.
  • Negative reviews repeatedly cite unclear instructions, heavy paper-based , and harsh interactions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn B or C grades and call the class doable, but , and workload can make grades frustrating.

Online reviews show both manageable and confusing paths to grades, while , and participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The fashion content is practical and hands-on, but and organization can make otherwise standard material feel harder.

Online difficulty depends heavily on Canvas clarity, while , and confusing directions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation matters across many reviews, and one student says she does not account for and attendance.

In-person reviews provide the clearest attendance concerns, while online and Canvas.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends strongly on student fit because praise for expertise is offset by repeated complaints about disorganization and communication.

Both formats are polarized, with online reviews especially split over whether Canvas makes the course easier or worse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several students call her a tough or nitpicky grader, and .

Format shift

Strict grading complaints appear in both formats, with online reviews especially .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Workload is often described as lots of , and required materials, though some students find it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload concerns focus on reading and , while , and paper packets.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her subject knowledge and hands-on lessons are praised, but many students report , and condescending interactions.

Format shift

Both formats are highly polarized, with online and in-person teaching most affected by classroom communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews , and submitted work more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and hands-on labs but also include intense complaints about disorganization, attitude, workload, and materials costs.

Main concern

, and a classroom style some describe as rude or confusing.

What students said

“Take Professor Young. She knows how to make industrial patterns so I can get a job in the .”
FASH108
“She has NO CANVAS COURSE, so be prepared to have piles of ”
FASH186

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly mixed, with and industry content while as chaotic and instructions as unclear.

Main concern

Canvas organization and risks.

What students said

“ and she is not good at teaching at all.”
FASH150
“ it easy because you can listen to lectures and submit work anytime of the day.”
FASH186

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , or final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and materials, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams, proctoring, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews mention Canvas assignments and submissions, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Similar to other as much as she is in person.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching polarization, organization, workload, and hands-on fashion value; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Awesome fashion teacher. . She's especially knowledgeable about patterns and fashion design.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“ and when asked about it is condescending.”

🧵 Hands-On Value

70/100

“I took my learning how to create a brand from her class and started my brand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Love this teacher for Fashion. She is the .
  • Bad at teaching and disrespectful.
  • and very condescending.

Theme 2

🧵 About Fashion Skills

  • Take Professor Young. She knows how to make industrial patterns so I can get a job in the .
  • Love my fashion design class like all the labs
  • The internship was awesome.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • She has NO CANVAS COURSE, so be prepared to have piles of collect when assignments are created.
  • and directions don't make sense at all.
  • The class is engaging, and the workload is manageable if you stay on top of it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

145

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent reviews across online and , though the extreme split in tone suggests a highly polarizing experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 592
4 out of 524
3 out of 56
2 out of 55
1 out of 519

Course coverage

FASH10811 reviews
FAS284A7 reviews
ALLFASH5 reviews
FASH1505 reviews
FASH1865 reviews
Show 8 more courses
1504 reviews
DRAP2093 reviews
FASH0933 reviews
FASH050F2 reviews
FASH1012 reviews
FASH108A1 review
FASH2991 review
FASHIONDESIGN1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

26

B+ 9 · B 17

C range

10

C+ 3 · C 6 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2