AI Rate Professor

English

Melissa Berry

ENGL20446 · ENG103 · ENGL14163 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid Berry unless you are comfortable with , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of homeworkLecture heavyTough graderFast talkerGood feedback
  • Most recent ENG103 reviews , and boring or rambling lectures.
  • A few , and one-on-one help.
  • The because students report severe penalties on essays and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One student called it an easy A with effort, but most , and failed or incomplete outcomes.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The writing work is not always conceptually impossible, but , and essay volume make the class challenging.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person ENG103 and English course reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation and long in-class lectures appear important.

online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because they report heavy homework, rambling lectures, and .

and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Several students report failing or being heavily penalized over essay mistakes, while only a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention , and limited time to complete work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few students praise her care and feedback, but most describe long, fast, boring, or rambling lectures and poor classroom experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is from in-person reviews, where students mostly describe heavy homework, long lectures, and .

Main concern

and workload may feel harsh or unpredictable.

What students said

“She talks too much and ”
ENG103
“Failing someone because of a .”
ENG103
“ ”
ENGL14163

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and homework, and they do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy because comments discuss essays, homework, prompts, and lectures instead.

Essay-focused assessmentNo clearly proven exam policy
“I will say I love the flexibility of the essays.”
ENG103
“ ”
ENG103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Talks VERY fast and talks A LOT.”

⚖️

20/100

“Failing someone because of a .”

📝 Workload Pressure

25/100

“She talks too much and and barely gives u time to do the homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Talks VERY fast and talks A LOT.
  • I almost fell asleep 6 times in that boring ahh class

Theme 2

📄

  • I love the flexibility of the essays.
  • and gives too many to assignments for the essay

Theme 3

⚖️

  • still gave me a hard F
  • Failing someone because of a .
  • easy A as long as you at least put effort in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews are available, but they span several years and show a consistent pattern of workload and lecture concerns.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1036 reviews
ENGL141631 review
ENGL204461 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1