AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mareike Claassen

MATH40 · ENGR203 · ENGR110F · MATH030 · MATH252 · MATH142 · ENGR201 · MATH20 · MATH100F · MATH020 · MATH250B · ENGR110 · MATH142F · TRIG142 · 85 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
60.53%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a demanding math class with lots of practice and can keep up with a fast pace.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homework loadFast-paced lecturesClear test preparationPolarizing teaching styleCaring but demanding
  • Students are highly split, with many calling her an excellent math teacher and many others saying she moves too fast or feels harsh.
  • The workload , and review practice.
  • reviews, but students must keep pace and do work her way.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

A grades are reachable when students do the , and reviews, but the workload and pace make it far from effortless.

, though online reviews include more extreme complaints about homework and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content and pace are challenging because students repeatedly mention fast lectures, lots of practice, and difficult problem solving.

, while online reviews reinforce that higher-level courses can feel very difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

, but , and lecture pace make class participation practically important.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while online reviews mention participation and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and hard practice, but not by students who need a slower or gentler teaching style.

but include many strong recommendations, while online reviews are mixed and more cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

She can be strict and method-specific, but students also mention , and predictable reviews.

Format shift

and hints, while online reviews include stricter complaints about required techniques.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

describing weekly hours, huge problem sets, daily quizzes, and extensive notes.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, and online MATH252 .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with and many others criticizing speed, tone, and .

Format shift

experience, while online reviews are fewer and more course-dependent.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment includes homework, quizzes, class work, midterms, finals, and study guides .

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and and activity points.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

can be excellent for disciplined students but overwhelming for others.

Main concern

The main risk is , and strict grading expectations.

What students said

“She .”
MATH142
“ notes, and really puts in the effort to ensure the students get the most out of her class.”
MATH142

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some saying tests are fair and predictable and , and poor notes.

Main concern

Online and must adapt to her required methods.

What students said

“The , and easy.”
MATH142
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK (I average 23 pages a week)”
MATH252

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews often say they follow study guides but require preparation and sometimes a specific method.

Study Guide SimilarityWeekly QuizzesMidterm And FinalZoom Exams MentionedMethod-Specific Work

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews commonly describe quizzes, midterms, finals, and exams similar to study guides, but .

Quizzes Every ClassMidterm And FinalStudy Guides Similar To ExamsPartial Credit Hints
“ she gives you, so if you can do the study guide, then you can do the exams.”
MATH142
“4 exams, and 1 cumulative final.”
MATH142F

Online

Online reviews , and method-specific work, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policies.

Zoom ExamsPredictable Tests MentionedMethod-Specific WorkDifficult Exams Mentioned
“No . Zoom exams.”
MATH252
“The , and easy.”
MATH142

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work alot but it .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ notes, and really puts in the effort to ensure the students get the most out of her class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“There is a truly insane amount of homework, though.”

🧮

56/100

“ she gives you, so if you can do the study guide, then you can do the exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good lecturer and provides notes.
  • She goes EXTREMELY fast hardly answers questions.
  • , and I noticed that the only students not passing were just not putting in the extra work nor paying attention in class.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Assigns 8-12 hours of .
  • She gives an enormous amount of HW.
  • .

Theme 3

📈

  • The , and easy.
  • Big on giving partial credit.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

85

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years with highly detailed and repeated , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 544
4 out of 515
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH14220 reviews
MATH142F7 reviews
MATH2524 reviews
TRIG1424 reviews
ENGR2033 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENGR110F2 reviews
ENGR2012 reviews
MATH202 reviews
ENGR1101 review
MATH0201 review
MATH0301 review
MATH100F1 review
MATH250B1 review
MATH401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 2