AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Ziza Delgado

ETHS235 · ETHS111F · ETHS101 · ETHS150F · ETHS150 · ETHS235HF · ETHS14412 · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
81.97%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want an inspiring Ethnic Studies class and can keep up with reading and large projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate lecturesReading heavyExtra creditCaring and flexibleMajor projects matter
  • Most students describe Delgado as passionate, caring, and easy to learn from.
  • Grades are usually very attainable, but readings and .
  • Online reviews are more mixed because several students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very common with completed readings, quizzes, and , and chances to resubmit.

Online evidence shows easy grades with more reading and organization risk, while in-person evidence shows very attainable grades through participation and presentations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

73/100

The course content is usually described as straightforward and interesting, but and .

and modules, while in-person sections emphasize easier lectures and class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Zoom meetings are often optional and sometimes , but and participation strongly support success.

, while in-person attendance is more important for discussions, presentations, and doing well.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes the material meaningful despite some organization issues.

, while online reviews include both strong praise and several serious complaints about organization.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Most students earned high grades and , and , though a few major assignments can dominate the grade.

Format shift

Online grading can feel risky because projects are heavily weighted, while as nice if students participate.

Workload

Moderate

61/100

The workload is manageable but , and of the grade.

Format shift

Online students mention more reading and weekly quizzes, while but important participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly describe her as passionate, caring, inspirational, and and clarity.

Format shift

, while online feedback is more mixed because organization problems are more visible.

Assessment method

Balanced

53/100

Grades usually combine readings, quizzes, discussions, participation, presentations, midterms, and .

Format shift

Online sections lean on quizzes, writing, and projects, while , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students are strongly positive, , and fair major projects.

Main concern

Attendance and participation help a lot, especially because lectures and presentations matter.

What students said

“Her lectures are very interesting and easy to follow.”
ETHS101
“ , as your grade is basically an and a presentation final project, but she grades very nicely.”
ETHS235HF
“Don't skip class so you can do well too!”
ETHS150F

Remote format

Online

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually find the class manageable and inspiring, but the main complaints , and .

Main concern

Online organization and .

What students said

“It's pretty straightforward. Sometime modules opened late but if they did, she extended due dates.”
ETHS150F
“She continuously posts modules late so watch out for that.”
ETHS101
“It is A LOT of reading, but as long as you read, you'll have no issue passing the class.”
ETHS150F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exams and finals as generally manageable when students do the readings, but and .

Major MidtermFinal ProjectPresentation FinalLecture QuizzesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and project-based finals, but they do not clearly prove closed-book exam rules or strict proctoring.

Oral MidtermPresentation FinalFinal ProjectParticipation
“The where to do a speech.”
ETHS101
“your grade is basically an and a ”
ETHS235HF
“the .”
ETHS101

Online

, and final projects, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Lecture QuizzesMidterm ProjectFinal ProjectWriting Heavy Final
“ as well.”
ETHS101
“ and final. All MCQ.”
ETHS235
“ , and .”
ETHS150F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and wants everyone in her class to get an A. Not an easy A per-say. Put in the work she is asking of you and you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is amazing and passionate about what she does.”

📈 Grade Value

86/100

“As long as you pay attention and do the .”

📚 Workload Reality

61/100

“It is A LOT of reading, but as long as you read, you'll have no issue passing the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are very interesting and easy to follow.
  • She is amazing and passionate about what she does.
  • Professor Delgado gives great video lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an easy A, !
  • Put in the work she is asking of you and you will get an A.
  • , as your grade is basically an and a presentation final project, but she grades very nicely.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • She continuously posts modules late so watch out for that.
  • Terrible teacher, she grades all your work at the end of the year, so if you fail you fail.
  • as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span several years, include both formats, and show consistent patterns with detailed comments.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ETHS10120 reviews
ETHS150F15 reviews
ETHS1507 reviews
ETHS2354 reviews
ETHS235HF2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ETHS111F1 review
ETHS144121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

39

A+ 9 · A 27 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2