AI Rate Professor

Paralegal

Lisa Patrick

PLEG201 · PLEG202 · PLEG205 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Only take her if , and unclear instruction for practical legal training.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderConfusing lecturesHeavy writing workloadUnclear instructionsPractical legal focus
  • Most negative reviews say she is knowledgeable but , and difficult to learn from.
  • Grades can be harsh because , and expectations may be vague.
  • A smaller group values , and opportunities.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Passing may be manageable, but getting an A requires careful detail work under strict and .

Online reviews stress vague expectations, while in and heavy practical standards.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The subject is made harder by , vague directions, and assignment expectations that many students do not understand.

Both formats report confusion, with online students especially citing cluttered modules and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as mandatory, but comments suggest missing instruction or support can make the work harder.

Online evidence mentions oral instructions and hard-to-follow lectures, while in person evidence does .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

because they find the course confusing, harshly graded, and poorly supported.

Online recommendations are especially weak, while in person reviews are sharply split between praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly describe , and little room for error.

Format shift

, though online reviews connect it more to unclear directions.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of , and assignments that demand detailed work.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online students adding that instructions and modules increase the burden.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students often say she knows the law but .

Format shift

Online teaching is described as , while in person reviews include both strong praise and severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The course , and test based, with more emphasis on written practical work than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus heavily on assignments and and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews are split between students who appreciate the real-world rigor and students who find the , and workload high.

Main concern

and weak teaching structure can make the class frustrating.

What students said

“ but grades super hard and nitpicks.”
PLEG201
“Easy to pass, hard if you want an A.”
PLEG201
“It was a lot of work but in the end I feel like I walked out knowing more than when I walked in.”
PLEG205

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing unclear modules, vague , and heavy self teaching.

Main concern

Students often feel lost because expectations and .

What students said

“ , and she gave oral instructions for them at the end of and with questions.”
PLEG205
“Modules cluttered and disorganized.”
PLEG201
“ and yet still vague.”
PLEG202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a , but they do not clearly prove the overall exam format or proctoring rules.

Extra Credit on TestsFinal from QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews mention and a , but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Extra Credit on TestsFinal from Quizzes
“She gives questions on every test.”
PLEG201
“The .”
PLEG201

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She may be a great attorney and well versed in the law but she has no idea on how to translate that to her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She may be a great attorney and well versed in the law but she has no idea on how to translate that to her students.”

⚖️

24/100

“ but grades super hard and nitpicks.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“It was a lot of work but in the end I feel like I walked out knowing more than when I walked in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lack of clarity, and unpreparedness was frustrating.
  • Lectures extremely -alot of talking that is completely irrelevant.
  • Shes very intelligent but she is not a good teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • All assignment grades are out of 10 points leaving no room for error.
  • Easy to pass, hard if you want an A.
  • She gives out a lot of and then grades it super hard.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and allows for .
  • She was really willing to work with me and help me to understand.
  • She provides little support to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 11 reviews are detailed and and teaching issues, but the sample is small and spans several years.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PLEG2015 reviews
PLEG2024 reviews
PLEG2052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1