AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jennifer Coons

PSY161F · PSY101 · PSY202F · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will keep up with assignments and math practice, but if you need a slow-paced course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful but demandingOpen-note examsExtra creditFast-paced labsMixed math support
  • Most students like her and report helpful support, but several warn the class can be fast-paced and math-heavy.
  • Grades can be good because of , and , but the workload is not effortless.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, while frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is achievable with effort because exams are often open-note and exists, but , and exams still require steady work.

Online evidence is more self-directed and mixed, while but still warns about math difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is moderately challenging because students repeatedly mention hard , and .

Online reviews stress fast-paced labs and self-teaching, while support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation and class engagement appear important, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online labs happen during Zoom time, while in-person reviews mainly mention .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and open-note exams, but negative reviews warn about pace and grading.

Online recommendations are mixed, while severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

, and dropped exams help, but some students call her tough or not considerate.

Format shift

Online reviews mention open-note exams and , while and tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and projects create a real workload, even when students find it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is more pressured by timed labs and , while in-person workload varies by course.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as , and caring, but a and weak engagement.

Format shift

Online teaching gets both strong praise and self-teaching complaints, while sharp negatives.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Students mention homework, labs, papers, quizzes, exams, research work, activities, and projects, so .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize labs, homework, quizzes, and exams, while , and activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about support and clarity, but include and pace.

Main concern

Students who struggle with math may find the course difficult and fast.

What students said

“She helps teach hard concepts in easier ways.”
Psy161F
“Strongly discourage anyone who struggles mathematically.”
Psy161F

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews praise open-note exams and access, but , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Labs and and require independent effort.

What students said

“ , but not enough.”
Psy161F
“All exams and .”
Psy161F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly overall because several reviews mention open-note exams, , a note card, or a .

Open-Note ExamsExtra CreditDropped Lowest ExamCheat Sheet Allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-note exams, a cheat sheet, , and a dropped lowest exam, but .

Open-Note ExamsCheat Sheet AllowedExtra CreditDrops Lowest Exam
“She even allows students to use a cheat sheet (note card front and .”
PSY202F
“She's the best. ( )”
psy101

Online

Online reviews explicitly say exams and webcam, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Open-Note ExamsOpen-Note QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Only thing that help me and (3 opportunities).”
Psy161F
“All exams and .”
Psy161F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr C. Was a great professor! I am not a math person but managed to do pretty well because of her lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She helps teach hard concepts in easier ways.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“You'll definitely appreciate her class if you pay attention!”

⚖️

64/100

“ and offers .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. C was a great professor.
  • , and can support her students' needs.
  • Nice person but awful professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a and not really considerate.
  • It's not easy to pass.
  • It should be easy if you put in the work.

Theme 3

🧪

  • as everything needs to be done within the zoom meeting time
  • All exams and .
  • Graded by , and group project.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews provide useful detail across formats, but opinions are more mixed and the sample is modest.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Psy161F8 reviews
PSY202F4 reviews
psy1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1