AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jennifer Kinkel

CDES22460 · CDES122F · CDES100 · 11394CDES120 · CDES201 · CDES120 · CDC210 · CDES122 · CDES125 · CDES120F · 11043CDES120 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
96.23%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a caring and passionate instructor, but stay current because online sections can become writing-heavy fast.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorPassionate LecturesWriting HeavyExtra CreditOpen-Book Friendly
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her warmth, passion for child development, and willingness to help.
  • In-person reviews usually describe the class as easy and , and friendly exams.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because some students report , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is realistic if students complete the , but papers, discussions, and .

, while online evidence shows more workload and tougher penalties for falling behind.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content is approachable because and gives structure, but reading and writing volume can make it feel demanding.

In-person reviews call the class easier, while online reviews , and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Attendance and participation often affect grades, especially in person, even though a few students say missing limited classes may be manageable.

; online reviews focus on deadlines and weekly submissions.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and helpful, despite workload concerns in some online sections.

, but online reviews include the clearest negative workload experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

guides, cheat sheets, and open-book evidence, though online reviews include tough-grading complaints.

Format shift

, while online grading appears less forgiving when students fall behind.

Workload

Moderate

59/100

The workload is manageable for organized students but , and readings.

Format shift

Online reviews describe heavier workload than in-person reviews, especially in CDES122 and writing-heavy courses.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and engaging.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, even when online students criticize workload.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades rely heavily on papers, discussions, homework, journals, projects, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions, quizzes, and papers, while , and study-guide exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive and describe engaging lectures, easy but , and caring support.

Main concern

Attendance and participation often matter, and .

What students said

“ but takes like 5 minutes. 3 papers but fairly easy.”
CDES120F
“As long as you show up to class and participate you will pass.”
CDES120F
“ !”
CDES120

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise her care and teaching, but workload concerns are stronger because of , and written exams.

Main concern

Online sections can be writing-heavy and difficult for procrastinators.

What students said

“I spent four full days completing all the work for this course.”
CDES122
“ and quizzes, 3 essays, a midterm, and final”
CDES120
“You have 3 papers, a midterm, and a .”
CDC210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly because reviews mention open-book or cheat-sheet exams, prompts in advance, and written or project-based finals.

Open Book EvidenceCheat SheetsStudy GuidesWritten Midterm And FinalProject Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or open-note tests, and exam questions given ahead of time.

Open Book Or NotesCheat Sheet AllowedQuestions Given AheadStudy Guides
“There's even study guides of the midterm and finals' questions and she allows cheat sheets.”
CDES120F
“most of !”
CDES120F
“For the but you know the questions & answers in advance.”
11043CDES120

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention an open-book midterm and final in one course and written exams or evidence.

Open BookWritten Midterm And FinalProject FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“You have 3 papers, a midterm, and a .”
CDC210
“Our final consisted of creating a 3-D classroom and playground out of boxes with a brochure or website.”
CDES122F

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the BEST! She makes me grateful to major in CD!! The content is so interesting, and pretty much if you stay engaged, you will pass!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Teaching Quality

96/100

“She is truly amazing and cares so much about her students....”

📚 Workload Reality

59/100

“There is a lot of writing involved and she is a .”

⚖️

80/100

“She doesn't try to trick you, it's all straight forward.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She is truly amazing and cares so much about her students....
  • and very passionate.
  • She is one of the best professors at fullerton college,recommend her she is seriously the best

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The , and the .
  • There are maybe 5 papers, but they are very easy and she is an .
  • This class is easy but you have to do the work.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Grades

  • She basically gives you the test as the study guide and lets you bring in an index card as a cheat sheet.
  • most of !
  • She offered and study guides.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years give detailed and consistent evidence, while .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 548
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDES12028 reviews
CDES120F5 reviews
CDES1225 reviews
CDES122F3 reviews
CDC2102 reviews
Show 6 more courses
CDES2012 reviews
11043CDES1201 review
11394CDES1201 review
CDES1001 review
CDES1251 review
CDES224601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

38

A+ 11 · A 27

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values