AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Juan Santana

124F · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can work independently with and minimal instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveUnclear instructionsLow supportOutdated courseHarsh feedback
  • Both reviews describe extremely poor communication and little meaningful support.
  • Students report , and outdated course management.
  • The evidence is entirely online and uniformly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and poor response to questions.

All evidence comes from online reviews; there is no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not described as intellectually extreme, but and outdated materials make it harder to navigate.

Only online reviews exist, and they focus more on poor course management than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only online reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly discourage taking him because of , and unresponsiveness.

and uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

One , and no useful explanation when asked.

Format shift

The grading evidence comes only from online reviews; there is .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and support more than workload volume, so workload lightness is uncertain.

Format shift

Only online reviews exist, and they do not clearly establish the amount of work.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Both students describe , and little care for the class.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is online, with no in-person reviews to compare.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention a midterm and , but do not clearly show .

Format shift

Only online reviews exist, and assessment structure is not fully described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing poor communication, unclear directions, weak support, and outdated course organization.

Main concern

Students may not receive timely answers, clear grading explanations, or reliable course management.

What students said

“ get meaningful support from him”
124f
“Instructions are unclear, he gives low grades with if i ask why and .”
124f

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or .

Midterm MentionedUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention a and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, Lockdown Browser, quiz format, or final format.

Midterm MentionedUnclear Exam Policy
“I submitted my midterm 3 days early for 15 points.”
124f

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ get meaningful support from him as he can't be bothered with his real job”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting communication, organization, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“His course is outdated, has no work put into it, which isn't surprising, he doesn't know where the class is or follows dates on his own syllabus”

📩 Communication

5/100

“ .”

⚖️

20/100

“Instructions are unclear, he gives low grades with if i ask why and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • get meaningful support from him
  • .

Theme 2

📋 About Organization

  • His course is outdated, has no work put into it
  • he doesn't know where the class is or follows dates on his own syllabus

Theme 3

⚖️

  • He gave me 5/15, not 15/0??, lowering my grade.
  • Instructions are unclear, he gives low grades with if i ask why and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

and negative, so the signal is consistent but limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

124f2 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1