AI Rate Professor

Drafting

Danny Carter

DRAFT70 · DRAFT994 · DRAF140 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you are and imperfect materials.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOutdated materialsTough gradingProject-heavyJob preparednessSlow communication
  • Recent online feedback , and delayed responses.
  • Older in-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising real-world experience and beginner accessibility.
  • The class can be passable if students work independently, but support and clarity are inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earned A grades by doing the work, but , and weak support make the A unreliable.

Online evidence suggests a harder and less fair path, while reports.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

CAD content can be manageable for beginners, but and outdated materials raise the practical difficulty.

The single online review makes the course feel messy, while frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

if homework is done at home, but most reviews do not clearly discuss attendance.

In-person evidence suggests some flexibility, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because the strongest though some older in-person students praised him.

Online evidence is negative, while and serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several comments describe tough grading, one-attempt work, and .

Format shift

Online grading sounds especially strict, while if all work is completed.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Project work and trial-and-error learning appear substantial, even if some students found the class easy.

Format shift

, while the online review focuses more on grading and unclear structure than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Some older reviews praise his experience and explanations, but recent complaints cite outdated videos, weak responses, and irritation with questions.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated poorly, while and mostly supported by older positive reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and handouts more than exams.

Format shift

and homework assessment, while the online review says everything was graded like a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with older students praising learning and job preparedness while and outdated videos.

Main concern

Students may need trial and error with limited patience for questions.

What students said

“Lots of projects and really expects you to find out how to do things through trial and error.”
DRAFT994
“He only allows 1 attempt you screw thing up you're done.”
DRAFT70

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is very negative, citing unclear test-like grading, old videos, slow responses, and a messy class.

Main concern

Online support and .

What students said

“He doesn't bother to respond until a week later, the whole class is a mess.”
DRAF140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove formal exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test-Like GradingExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review says work was graded like a test but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Test-Like Grading
“he grades everything like a Test”
DRAF140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and project-based learning. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ and if you never taken this class before or don't know what it is you can still pass.”

⚖️

28/100

“He only allows 1 attempt you screw thing up you're done.”

🧰 Practical Learning

50/100

“His classes are great for job preparedness.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He recorded the videos from 2004. Out of date.
  • Gets aggravated if you ask questions.
  • He seems tough and mean at first but his a great guy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades everything like a syllabus whatsoever.
  • Do the work and you'll pass.
  • Super easy class especially considering it was my first time leanring about CAD.

Theme 3

🧩 About Workload & Materials

  • Lots of projects and really expects you to find out how to do things through trial and error.
  • and I was frequently absent yet still recieved an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews are available, and , so recent online criticism carries high weight but limited sample confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DRAF1403 reviews
DRAFT702 reviews
DRAFT9941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1