AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Arambula

Courses not reported · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
64%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to improve as a writer and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough essay graderPop culture lecturesHelpful feedbackMany papersMixed student experience
  • Students are sharply split between engaging, supportive teaching and .
  • The course can improve writing, but and .
  • Students who ask questions early, follow prompt sheets closely, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students often need strong writing skills, close prompt-following, tutoring, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is understandable for some students, but essays, reading, critical thinking, and fast or .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it ranges from easy to follow to very challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but participation, in-class engagement, calendar checks, and deadline awareness appear important.

, and no online comparison exists.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and engagement, but harsh grading makes the recommendation highly conditional.

All and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many reviews describe tough, vague, or and follow rubrics.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention , and short essay deadlines.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with workload ranging from manageable to heavy.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

He can be engaging, funny, patient, and helpful, but some students describe lectures as boring, uncomfortable, or unhelpful.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and teaching quality is the most polarized part of the evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear , and prompt-based writing work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment evidence centers on writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, showing engaging lectures and feedback but frequent complaints about harsh or .

Main concern

Many students say understand even after feedback.

What students said

“His teaching style incorporates references to pop & gaming culture, and it makes English more immersive.”
10099
“As someone who usually gets A's and B's in .”
10099
“ . No one .”
10099

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

QuizzesTests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and discussions, but do not clearly prove midterm, final, proctoring, or open-book policies.

QuizzesTests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven
“Quiezes are dumb easy, but the because you have to engage with evidence.”
10099
“ and so suddenly you were missing 4 discussions and 2 tests randomly.”
10099

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is challenging and overall made me a better writer, but if you're not experienced.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“His teaching style incorporates references to pop & gaming culture, and it makes English more immersive.”

⚖️

25/100

“ . No one .”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“ . He is an and most essays were extremely difficult especially since my class only had 2 days to write an essay.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor, his teaching style incorporates gaming & pop culture and makes English bearable for someone who dislikes English.
  • In class lectures are boring.
  • Prof. , and provides several deadline reminders.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • As someone who usually gets A's and B's in .
  • Would not take again, he gives good feedback but and having help from several people, I still got D's and F's on my grades.
  • Just make sure that you follow the prompt sheet, and you're golden!

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Writing

  • though.
  • don't procrastinate, and I only got the grade I did because I didn't try hard enough in the beginning.
  • He will push you to write, and want to become a good writer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 recent in-person reviews provide , and teaching style.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 52

Course coverage

1009923 reviews
236192 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2