AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Noreen Meyer

CIS226F · CIS100 · 226F · CIS226 · CIS111 · CIS201 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80.77%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take Meyer if you want supportive instruction and , but expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulTough but clear graderOpen-book quizzes and testsBeginner-friendly with prior codingLecture heavy
  • Most students praise her care, feedback, and .
  • Grades are usually high, but coding-standard issues.
  • The class is easier for students with prior programming experience and can feel slow or lecture-heavy online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

High grades are common, but students still need to follow rubrics and .

Online and in-person reviews both show many A grades, while and class help make the A reachable.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

73/100

The material is usually manageable, especially with prior programming experience, but true beginners may need extra effort.

Online reviews call the class a cakewalk for prepared students, while help.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several reviews describe quizzes or graded work at the start or end of class, so .

, while online evidence mentions tuning in for in-class assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and helpful, despite recurring complaints about tone and .

, while online reviews are positive on grades but more mixed on lecture style and tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and often leads to A grades, but small code or .

Format shift

Both formats mention tough or usually small when the rubric is followed.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students report , and coding assignments, but most describe them as doable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention long lectures and straightforward homework, while , and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most , and care, though a minority describe her as rude or ineffective.

Format shift

because students get direct help, while online teaching has more complaints about monotone lectures and tone.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of , and tests rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and quizzes, while and in-class assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are stronger because students , and .

Main concern

Attendance and in-class work matter, and .

What students said

“ your grade.”
CIS226F
“She's a but and patient and will help you work out every single issue until your code runs perfectly.”
CIS226

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews show high grades and , but some students found lectures dull or her tone condescending.

Main concern

Long online lectures and .

What students said

“If you took 123F or had ANY CS classes prior (including APCSA), this class is a cakewalk.”
226F
“Her lectures were incredibly hard to pay attention to (9am-1:15pm) as they were very long, info heavy, and dull in my opinion.”
CIS226F

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly because multiple reviews describe open-book quizzes or .

Open-book quizzesOpen-book testsApplication examsMidterm and final mentionedNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, making exams relatively low risk.

Open-note quizOpen-book quizzesOpen-book testsApplication exams
“ the beginning of class that's open note.”
CIS226
“ your grade.”
CIS226F
“the test and so it's likely that you'll do good.”
CIS226F

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, midterm, and final, but .

Quizzes mentionedMidterm and final mentionedNo clear proctoring evidence
“ , and the so you'll know exactly what to study for on the midterm and final.”
CIS201
“You start the class with a she lectures for how long she wants to then you do an in-class assignment and after you are done with that, you can leave.”
CIS226

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a but and patient and will help you work out every single issue until your code runs perfectly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“This teacher gives some of the .”

⚖️

55/100

“ , but very small dent if .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“I have greatly appreciated Professor Meyer!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are very easy to understand and give examples on what is X and how it can be used for Y.
  • She makes sure you know the subject before she moves on.
  • SHE LITERALLY SHOWS YOU WHAT TO DO.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you pay attention and .
  • This professor is a little bit of a .
  • , and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Noreen truly cares about students!
  • She is NOT afraid to help you, so don't be afraid of calling out for help.
  • VERY condescending and passive aggressive when answering questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 31 reviews span many years, include detailed workload and , and show consistent themes.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CIS11111 reviews
226F7 reviews
CIS2265 reviews
CIS226F5 reviews
241781 review
Show 2 more courses
CIS1001 review
CIS2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 7 · A 17

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1