AI Rate Professor

Theater

Kaylynn Sutton

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnreliableOften absentLate gradingLate assignmentsLimited help
  • The only review describes serious reliability problems, including absence and distraction in class.
  • fraction of assignments graded by week 13.
  • while older due dates remain, creating unfair late submissions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The grade evidence is limited, but late posting and and stressful.

, so there is no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The review does not say the content is hard, but the course structure makes it harder to manage.

Only in-person evidence exists and it focuses on organization, not content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review says the professor is often absent but does .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student review is strongly negative because of absence, distraction, poor availability, and .

and it is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

There is , but and unfair late labels suggest a harsh experience.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload appears heavy because many assignments remain ungraded and more are still due near the end of the term.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists and the course.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

The review describes the professor as unreliable, absent, distracted, and rarely available for help.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists and it is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The and does not mention exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists and it describes assignments, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review reports an unreliable professor with , and .

Main concern

Course organization and .

What students said

“This professor is unreliable-often absent, distracted in class, and .”
20815
“ but keeps earlier due dates”
20815

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is unreliable-often absent, distracted in class, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and course organization. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“This professor is unreliable-often absent, distracted in class, and .”

⚠️ Course Organization

25/100

“ but keeps earlier due dates, causing us to submit "late" even when it's her delay.”

📉

25/100

“We're in week 13 and only 5 of 20+ assignments are graded”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Reliability

  • This professor is unreliable-often absent, distracted in class, and .
  • We're in week 13 and only 5 of 20+ assignments are graded

Theme 2

📌 About Course Management

  • but keeps earlier due dates, causing us to submit "late" even when it's her delay.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the concerns are serious but not broadly corroborated.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

208151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values