AI Rate Professor

Physics

Anthony Rivera

250AC · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and and unpredictable grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesIncoherent teachingTough gradingTest heavyOne positive outlier
  • Two of three reviews , and poor learning value.
  • One brief positive review calls him funny and caring, but it lacks detail compared with the negative reviews.
  • The reported difficulty is inconsistent because one student dropped while another found the class easy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

One student earned an A+, but , and one withdrawal, so the A is not reliably easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course may not be conceptually impossible, but and .

, so no online comparison can be made.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

The and does not establish an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most detailed reviews strongly warn students away because of poor clarity and weak teaching structure.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Two reviews tag him as a and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews complain more about vague assignments and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The detailed reviews describe incoherent, unstructured lectures and poor learning value.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Negative reviews tag the class as test heavy, but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with complaints about incoherent lectures, vague assignments, and .

Main concern

Students may need outside resources because lecture clarity is the main weakness.

What students said

“Lectures were incoherent rants, assignments were vague, and .”
250AC
“No structure, no clarity, just endless rambling.”
250AC
“lol funny guy”
250AC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews indicate test-heavy assessment, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews tag the class as test heavy, but .

Test Heavy
“ ”
250AC
“Test heavy”
250AC

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more from random YouTube videos than I did from an entire semester of their nonsense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Lectures were incoherent rants, assignments were vague, and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“If .”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is living proof that knowing a subject doesn't mean you can teach it.
  • No structure, no clarity, just endless rambling.
  • lol funny guy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and .

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Experience

  • I learned more from random YouTube videos than I did from an entire semester of their nonsense.
  • I left every class dumber than when I walked in.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is very brief while the other two are strongly negative and same-dated.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

250AC3 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1