AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Mohammad Abdel Haq

SOC277 · SOC290F · SOC101H · SOC292ONLINE · SOC101F · SOC101 · SOCI371 · SOC100 · SOC1 · SOC277HF · SOC292 · 20792SOC · SOC1O1 · SOC21131 · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
77.63%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you value engaging lectures and , but be cautious with online writing-heavy sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesExtra credit availableEasy but reading-basedInconsistent gradingOnline grading delays
  • Most in-person students praise his passionate, funny lectures and say the class is interesting and manageable.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with many easy-A reports but , and late feedback.
  • Grades are , and , but expectations can feel inconsistent in some sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students earn A , and , but writing-heavy sections and inconsistent grading prevent it from being effortless.

classes with engaging lectures, while online sections are more uneven because of writing grades and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The sociology content is usually approachable and interesting, though , and test preparation.

Online courses rely more on reading, quizzes, and written work, while , and class engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but several reviews say lectures, notes, participation, or attendance checks matter for passing.

and lecture dependence more often, while online reviews focus on weekly modules and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for engaging lectures and , but a , and organization.

In-person recommendation is stronger and responsiveness complaints are more common.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and simple assessments help grades, but multiple reviews describe tough, unclear, or .

Format shift

Online grading is the bigger concern, while , notes, and clear test material.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Work is usually manageable, with readings, quizzes, tests, papers, and .

Format shift

Online sections can require more reading and writing, while but depend on lectures and exams.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise his passion, humor, and lecture quality, but some report disorganization and weak clarity.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are strongly positive overall, while online teaching reviews are mixed because support and .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine quizzes, tests, papers, discussions, projects, lectures, and depending on the course.

Format shift

Online sections lean toward quizzes, tests, discussions, and papers, while , and lecture-based quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing strong lectures, humor, passion, , and .

Main concern

Some students complain about disorganization, tough tests, attendance expectations, or lectures that feel too opinion-driven.

What students said

“ .”
SOC101
“Honestly a really cool guy and is pretty liberal in regards to his own values and teaching style.”
SOC101F
“lectures lacked structure and were useless.”
SOC100

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many students find modules, quizzes, and easy, while and slow feedback.

Main concern

Online , and tougher to grade than the difficulty rating suggests.

What students said

“Somewhat easy class and I got an A by watching the videos and recorded lectures and he gives .”
SOC101F
“This professor had the .”
SOC292
“dont expect your assignments to be graded in a timely manner though.”
SOC292

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and sometimes student-friendly, but policies vary by course and format.

Open Note or Open Book in Some SectionsCheat Sheet Allowed in Some SectionsMultiple Choice QuizzesTests and FinalExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention some , and cheat sheet exams, though other sections have tougher tests.

Open BookOpen NoteTake-Home QuizzesCheat Sheet AllowedIn-Person Tests
“3 exams (open and essay.”
SOC277
“ . !”
SOC277HF
“ but he allows a cheat sheet.”
SOC101F

Online

, and papers, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Multiple Choice QuizzesTestsFinalPapers
“ and 2 discussions and .”
SOC101F
“There were only 2 tests plus a final.”
SOC100
“Read power points, take weekly quizzes, write about 3 papers, and that's it.”
SOC292

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is very clear on how and also gives for attending free weekly study sessions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He made the class very interesting and I enjoyed listening to him.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ if I could.”

⚖️

62/100

“This professor had the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • He gives the !
  • His funny personality is what keeps the class interesting even though it's online.
  • I changed my major from business to sociology because of professor Haq.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Somewhat easy class and I got an A by watching the videos and recorded lectures and he gives .
  • Go to SI sessions, show up to class, and you'll pass.
  • If you are expecting to get an A in the class beware it will be near impossible.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • dont expect your assignments to be graded in a timely manner though.
  • and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 analyzed reviews span online and themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 510

Course coverage

SOC10115 reviews
SOC101F9 reviews
SOC2929 reviews
SOC2773 reviews
SOC292ONLINE3 reviews
Show 9 more courses
SOC1002 reviews
SOC1O12 reviews
20792SOC1 review
SOC11 review
SOC101H1 review
SOC211311 review
SOC277HF1 review
SOC290F1 review
SOCI3711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 9 · A 20

B range

8

B+ 4 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1